Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 2910 of 2024: Inadmissibility and Justification of the Appeal.

Explore the recent ruling no. 2910 of 2024 that clarifies the inadmissibility of grounds in a criminal appeal and its legal implications. Discover how additional grounds can influence the final decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 2124 of 2024: Corruption in Judicial Acts and the Role of the Public Official

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 2124 of 2024, which clarifies the necessary requirements to constitute the crime of corruption in judicial acts and the crucial role of the public official in the process. Let’s discover the details and legal implications together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 4170 of 2024: Precautionary Appeals and Return of Seized Assets

Analysis of the recent ruling no. 4170 of 2024 concerning real precautionary appeals and third-party rights regarding the return of seized assets, with a focus on ownership and availability of the assets.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 2772 of 2024: The Reasoning in Judgments and the Role of Wiretaps.

Analysis of ruling no. 2772 of 2024, which clarifies the requirements of reasoning in criminal judgments, with particular reference to the use of telephone interceptions. An in-depth look at the principles of clarity and linearity in the reasoning of evidence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 3824 of 2024: Archiving and Computer Malfunctions

The ruling no. 3824 of 2024 clarifies the procedures for archiving in case of computer malfunctions, establishing limits and rights for the public prosecutor. A thorough analysis of the provision and its legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 2776 of 2024: Cartabia Reform and Electricity Theft

Analysis of ruling no. 2776 of 2024, which clarifies the prosecutability of electricity theft in light of the Cartabia reform. It highlights the limits and the possibilities of contestation by the public prosecutor.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 2778 of 2024 on Judicial Jurisdiction in Case of Annulment with Referral.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the rules of jurisdiction for judges in the event of annulment with referral of judgments issued by the juvenile section of the Court of Appeal. Let's explore the details of this important decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 4163 of 2024: The Appointment of Two Counsel in the Civil Part and Its Consequences.

Let’s analyze the ruling no. 4163 of 2024, with particular attention to the issue of the appointment of two defenders by the civil party and the legal implications of this choice.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 2030 of 2024: the causal link in omission crimes.

Analysis of judgment no. 2030 of 2024 regarding the causal link in omission crimes, with particular reference to judicial assessment and the methods of formulation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 4164 of 2024: Justified Reason in Non-Compliance with the Removal Order.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important insights into the notion of justified reason for non-compliance with the order to leave the territory, clarifying the conditions of absolute impossibility for foreigners.