Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 1270 of 2024: The Rationale of the Judgment and the Powers of the Court of Appeal.

Let's explore the recent ruling no. 1270 of the Court of Appeal of Cagliari, which clarifies the methods of supplementing the reasoning by the appellate judge and the implications for the defendant.

Bianucci Law Firm
Illegitimacy of Total Seizure of Evidence: Analysis of Judgment No. 1286 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation highlights the importance of reasoning in the evidentiary seizure of electronic data. A detailed analysis of the rights to privacy and the secrecy of correspondence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 3067 of 2024: Omission of Reporting by a Public Official

Let's analyze ruling no. 3067 of 2024, which clarifies the responsibilities of public officials in the event of failure to report a crime, highlighting the importance of acting within the scope of their duties.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 3066 of 2024: Appeal by the Public Prosecutor in Case of Acquittal.

An in-depth analysis of ruling no. 3066 of 2024, which clarifies the limits and possibilities of appeal for the public prosecutor in acquittal judgments for offenses punishable by fines.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 1283 of 2024: Restoration of the Deadline for Appeal.

Let’s explore the recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Naples regarding the restoration of the term for appeal, in light of the new regulatory provisions introduced by Legislative Decree No. 150 of 2022.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 604 of 2024: Precautionary Measures and Registration in the Criminal Record.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 604 of 2024, which clarifies the legitimacy of precautionary measures even in the absence of registration in the criminal record, highlighting the legal and practical implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 614 of 2024: Extradition and Precautionary Measures

Analysis of the recent ruling by the Court of Appeal of Rome regarding precautionary measures in the context of extradition, focusing on the legitimacy of the suspension of coercive measures for internal justice needs.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 1919 of 2024: Appeal and Obligation of Specific Statement of Reasons.

Ruling no. 1919 of 2024 clarifies the importance of specificity in the grounds for appeal, highlighting how the lack of details can compromise the right to defense and the judge's assessment.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 3096 of 2024: Online Fraud and Impaired Defense.

Analysis of ruling no. 3096 of 2024 clarifying the conditions for the aggravating factor of diminished defense in online fraud, highlighting the vulnerability of buyers in verifying products and sellers.

Bianucci Law Firm
Disclosure of official secrets: commentary on Judgment No. 3755 of 2024

The ruling no. 3755 of 2024 clarifies the dynamics of liability in the disclosure of office secrets, addressing the figure of the extraneus and its legal implications.