Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 39680 of 2024: Preventive Seizures and Protection of Third Creditors.

Analysis of the recent ruling No. 39680 of 2024, which clarifies the methods of verifying third-party claims in relation to preventive seizures, in light of legislative changes and the principle of good faith.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 37635 of 2024: The Recusal of the Judge in Case of Different Facts.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Reggio Calabria provides important clarifications on the disqualification of a judge when judging the same defendant for different facts. Let's explore the details and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Inadmissibility of WhatsApp Messages: Analysis of Judgment No. 39548 of 2024

The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2024 clarifies the limits on the acquisition of WhatsApp messages by the judicial police, highlighting the need for a seizure warrant to ensure their validity as evidence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 40174 of 2024: The Role of the Bankruptcy Trustee and the Refusal of Official Acts.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation No. 40174 of 2024 clarifies the limits of the bankruptcy trustee's liability, distinguishing between delay and refusal of official acts. Let us explore the necessary conditions to configure the offense.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 40177 of 2024: Inadmissibility of the Public Prosecutor's Appeal to the Supreme Court.

Judgment no. 40177 of 2024 examines the issue of the inadmissibility of the appeal to the Court of Cassation filed by the public prosecutor in the case of abnormal acts, delving into the concept of interest in appealing.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 37745 of 2024: Admissibility of Complaint and Damage.

Analysis of ruling no. 37745 of 2024 addressing the issue of prosecutability upon complaint in relation to property damage offenses, highlighting the legal and practical implications for citizens and legal practitioners.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 39560 of 2024 Regarding Extradition in the Context of Armed Conflict.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the issue of extradition to countries involved in armed conflicts, highlighting the necessary guarantees to avoid inhuman and degrading treatment.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 38772 of 2024: Offense Against a Public Official and Virtual Presence.

The recent ruling no. 38772 of 2024 emphasizes the equivalence between physical and virtual presence in cases of contempt of public officials, with significant implications for Italian jurisprudence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 39550 of 2024: Unlawful Interferences in Private Life and Consent in Interception.

Analysis of ruling no. 39550 of 2024, which addresses the crime of unlawful interference in private life and the importance of consent, even within one's own home. An in-depth look at the legal implications and current regulations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 37438 of 2024: Reflections on the European Arrest Warrant

Analyzing the recent ruling no. 37438 of 2024 provides an important opportunity to understand the mechanisms of the European arrest warrant and the implications of the finality of the conviction in the Italian and European legal context.