• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Abbreviated Judgment and Revocation of the Request: Analysis of Ruling No. 34854 of 2023

Ruling No. 34854 of 2023 represents an important decision in the criminal field, concerning the conditions for the revocation of the request for an abbreviated judgment. In this article, we will analyze the content of the ruling, its implications, and the importance of the evidentiary platform in the context of the criminal process.

Context of the Ruling

The Court of Cassation, with this decision, clarified that in the case of an abbreviated judgment following the notification of the decree of immediate judgment, it is possible to revoke the request for an alternative procedure. This is possible when new evidence or findings emerge that can significantly influence the position of the defendant and of which the latter has not been informed.

Abbreviated judgment following the notification of the decree of immediate judgment – Revocation of the request – Possibility - Existence - Conditions. Regarding the abbreviated judgment following the notification of the decree of immediate judgment, the revocation of the request is allowed in cases where the evidentiary platform, concerning which the criminal action was exercised and the indicated decree was issued, is enriched by the outcome of a finding of particular relevance for the position of the defendant, of which the defendant has not been informed with the notice of deposit of the act and which has been acquired into the file after the formalization of the request for an alternative procedure.

Conditions for the Revocation of the Request

The ruling clearly establishes the conditions under which the revocation of the request for an abbreviated judgment is permitted. It is essential that the new evidence or finding is of particular relevance and that its content has not been previously communicated to the defendant. This aspect underscores the importance of transparency and completeness of information in the criminal process.

  • New evidence of significant relevance.
  • No prior information to the defendant.
  • Acquisition of evidence after the request for an abbreviated judgment.

Legal and Jurisprudential Implications

This ruling fits into a broader legal context, influenced by norms such as the New Code of Criminal Procedure, particularly Articles 438 and 458, which govern abbreviated judgments and the conditions for their implementation. Previous case law, such as rulings No. 20803 of 2017 and No. 33908 of 2017, had already addressed similar issues, but ruling No. 34854 of 2023 provides further clarifications and specifies the conditions for the revocation of the request.

Conclusions

In conclusion, ruling No. 34854 of 2023 represents a significant evolution in Italian criminal law, specifying the necessary conditions for the revocation of the request for an abbreviated judgment. This development underscores the importance of a fair and transparent process, ensuring that the defendant has access to all relevant information that may influence their judicial fate. The certainty of the law and the protection of the defendant's rights remain fundamental in the Italian legal system.