• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Comment on the Sentence Cass. pen. n. 41120 of 2024: Analysis of Aiding and Murder

The recent ruling of the Supreme Court of Cassation n. 41120, issued on July 11, 2024, offers an important opportunity for reflection on two serious crimes: murder and personal aiding. In this article, we will analyze the key points of this decision, highlighting the legal implications and practical considerations that emerge from the judicial proceedings.

Reconstruction of the Facts and Criminal Responsibility

The Court of Assize of Appeal of Milan confirmed the conviction of A.A. for murder and B.B. for personal aiding. The ruling clarifies that A.A. acted deliberately, firing shots at C.C., while B.B. attempted to hinder the investigations through false statements. The Court excluded self-defense and considered provocation irrelevant, confirming the responsibility of both defendants.

The Court clarified that the proportion between the unjust act and the reaction does not constitute an element required by law for the recognition of the mitigating circumstance of provocation.

The Crime of Aiding: Analysis and Jurisprudence

The crime of personal aiding was analyzed in detail. B.B. was found guilty not only for omitting relevant information but also for providing a version of the facts that distorted reality, contributing to contaminating the investigations. The Court referred to previous case law, emphasizing that it is sufficient for the agent's conduct to somehow obstruct the investigations, without the need to demonstrate an actual alteration.

  • Aiding is considered a danger crime, committed at the moment the aiding action is performed.
  • It is not necessary for the action to have actually achieved the effect of obstructing the investigations.
  • The conduct must be evaluated based on its intrinsic ability to divert the investigations.

Final Considerations on Provocation and Punishment

A crucial aspect of the ruling is the assessment of provocation as a mitigating factor. The Court argued that, for it to be configured, a correlation between the offense received and the reaction is necessary. In the case of A.A., the Court held that there was no sufficient provocation to justify the murderous action. Furthermore, the calculation of the penalty was discussed, with the Court confirming the correctness of the first-instance judge's reasoning regarding the measure of the imposed penalty.

Conclusions

The ruling Cass. pen. n. 41120 of 2024 represents an important reflection on how Italian criminal law addresses serious crimes such as murder and aiding. The detailed analysis by the Court provides a clear framework on the applicable legal principles, emphasizing the importance of the proportion between offense and reaction and the significance of criminal responsibility in complex contexts. This decision offers useful insights for lawyers and legal scholars, inviting a deeper reflection on the legal dynamics at play.