• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Analysis of the Judgment of the Italian Supreme Court, Criminal Section, no. 43745 of 2024: Extortion and Criminal Liability

The judgment of the Supreme Court, pronounced on November 29, 2024, offers important insights into the issue of extortion and related criminal liabilities. The appellants A.A. and B.B. had their appeals declared inadmissible, bringing to light crucial questions regarding the burden of proof and the evaluation of testimonies in criminal proceedings.

The Context of the Judgment

The Court of Appeals of Naples had already partially reformed the first-instance judgment, reducing the sentences imposed on the two defendants for aggravated extortion. The appeals to the Supreme Court focused on alleged flaws in reasoning and violations of law, particularly regarding the sufficiency of evidence supporting the alleged unlawful conduct.

The Supreme Court clarified that the grounds for appeal must be specific and not generic, and that the reasoning of the Court of Appeals was logical and free from illogicality.

Reasons for Inadmissibility

  • Inadequacy of the defensive arguments: the appellants reiterated arguments already examined without providing new evidence.
  • Conformity of the reasoning: the Court confirmed the reconstruction of the facts made by the lower court judges, deeming the collected evidence sufficient, including the statements of cooperating witnesses.
  • Role of technology in evidence: the use of GPS to demonstrate the simultaneous presence of the appellants at the location of the extortion was considered a valid piece of evidence.

Legal Implications and Conclusions

The judgment in question emphasizes the importance of the solidity of evidence in a criminal proceeding, especially in cases of extortion involving criminal organizations. Defenses based on generic arguments and not supported by concrete elements may prove ineffective. Furthermore, the use of modern technologies such as GPS can play a crucial role in the collection of evidence.

In conclusion, judgment no. 43745 of 2024 represents an important precedent in Italian jurisprudence regarding criminal liability in extortion contexts, highlighting the need for clear and well-structured evidence to support the charges.