• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Fraudulent and Documentary Bankruptcy: Commentary on the Sentence of the Supreme Court of Cassation No. 45044/2022

The recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Cassation, No. 45044 of November 25, 2022, provides significant insights regarding the crimes of fraudulent and documentary bankruptcy. This decision not only analyzes the liability of the directors of bankrupt companies but also clarifies the importance of proper maintenance of accounting documentation. In this article, we will delve into the key points of the ruling and their impact on Italian jurisprudence.

The Facts of the Case and Initial Convictions

In the ruling under examination, A.A., the director of a company that went bankrupt in 2013, was convicted of fraudulent and documentary bankruptcy. The Court of Appeal of Florence upheld the conviction, but A.A. appealed the decision, arguing that there was no valid evidence for his liability, either regarding the diversion of assets or the failure to maintain accounting records.

Controversial Points and Motivational Flaws

A.A.'s grounds for appeal focused on two main aspects: the proof of the availability of the transferred assets and the preservation of the accounting documentation. In particular, the first argument highlighted how the Court had not clarified whether the assets in question had actually been diverted or if their sale had been simulated. The Supreme Court emphasized that the assets subject to bankruptcy cannot include those held under a precarious title, such as in the case of a loan for use.

The notion of assets belonging to the bankrupt includes only those things that have entered the bankrupt's estate.

Regarding the accounting documentation, the Supreme Court confirmed that the director is responsible for the proper maintenance and preservation of the accounting books, even if stored in digital format. The Court reiterated that the preservation of accounting data must ensure accessibility at all times, and any malfunction of the systems does not exempt the director from their obligations.

Implications of the Ruling

This ruling represents an important legal precedent as it clarifies that the responsibility of directors is not limited to the mere preservation of documents but also extends to the prevention of potential malfunctions. The Supreme Court annulled the conviction for fraudulent bankruptcy but upheld the conviction for simple documentary bankruptcy, highlighting the need for careful management of accounting records.

  • The director's responsibility extends to all aspects of accounting management.
  • It is essential to demonstrate the provenance and regularity of the assets in the event of bankruptcy.
  • The proper maintenance of accounting books is crucial to avoid penalties.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the ruling of the Supreme Court of Cassation No. 45044/2022 offers an important reflection on the responsibility of directors of bankrupt companies. It emphasizes how oversight and proper management of accounting documentation are crucial elements to avoid serious criminal consequences. Directors must be aware of their duties and the legal implications of their actions to protect not only their position but also the interests of the company and creditors.