• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Fraudulent Bankruptcy: Commentary on the Judgment of the Supreme Court, Criminal Section V, No. 41536 of 2024

The ruling of the Supreme Court No. 41536 of 2024 offers an interesting reflection on the issue of payments made by shareholders for future capital increases, placing them in the context of fraudulent bankruptcy. The Court examined the case of A.A., convicted for having returned sums to shareholders while the company was in economic distress, highlighting the importance of protecting creditors' interests.

The Context of the Judgment

The Court of Appeal of Florence had upheld A.A.'s conviction for fraudulent bankruptcy, believing that the withdrawals made in favor of shareholders during a time of crisis for the company had compromised the integrity of the share capital and harmed creditors. A.A.'s defense contested the decision based on an alleged legitimacy of the reimbursements, arguing that the company was able to meet its liabilities.

The Court clarified that returning payments to shareholders in the presence of a business crisis can constitute a crime, as it alters the company's financial situation.

Relevance of Payments for Future Capital Increase

One of the central issues addressed by the Court concerns the qualification of payments for future capital increases. It was emphasized that such payments, while not immediately increasing the share capital, are considered risk capital, and cannot be reimbursed until the failure of the capital increase is officially declared. This aspect is crucial in determining whether the reimbursements made by A.A. had a legal basis.

  • Payments for future capital increases are akin to risk capital.
  • The right to reimbursement arises only if the capital increase has not occurred within a set timeframe.
  • Returning such sums during a phase of business crisis compromises the position of creditors.

The Implications of the Judgment for Legal Practitioners

This ruling represents an important reference for lawyers and legal advisors operating in the field of commercial and bankruptcy law. It reiterates the importance of carefully considering reimbursement operations to shareholders during periods of business crisis and calls for a rigorous assessment of the legitimacy of such operations. Furthermore, the Court clarified that failure to comply with the regulations regarding payments for future capital increases can lead to criminal liability for directors.

Conclusions

Ultimately, the ruling No. 41536 of 2024 by the Supreme Court underscores the importance of protecting creditors' interests and the rigor with which issues related to payments for future capital increases must be handled. Directors must be aware of the legal consequences of their actions, especially in crisis situations, to avoid incurring criminal liability.