Medical Liability: Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, No. 25825 of 2024
The judgment of the Court of Cassation No. 25825 of 2024 addresses the delicate issue of professional liability in the medical field, with particular reference to informed consent and the causal link between the doctor's conduct and the damage suffered by the patient. The case involves A. A., who, after a surgical operation that led to serious consequences, sued the doctors and the healthcare facility to obtain compensation for damages. The decision of the Court of Cassation provides important insights for understanding the evolution of case law concerning medical liability.
The Case of A. A. and the First Instance Decision
A. A. had consulted several specialists for the treatment of lumbar sciatica. After receiving conflicting diagnoses, he opted for a surgical intervention that resulted in serious complications, including paralysis of the lower limbs. In the first instance, the Court of Lecce accepted the claim for compensation, recognizing medical liability for the erroneous choice to proceed with the surgical intervention rather than opting for conservative treatment.
The Judgment of the Court of Appeal and the Appeal to the Court of Cassation
However, the Court of Appeal of Lecce overturned this decision, concluding that the intervention had been performed correctly and that the damage suffered by A. A. was not foreseeable. This led the patient to appeal to the Court of Cassation, contesting the Court of Appeal's assessment regarding the causal link and the importance of informed consent.
The Court of Cassation accepted the appeal, highlighting errors in the causal reasoning of the Court of Appeal.
The Conclusions of the Court of Cassation
The Court of Cassation found the grounds of the appeal to be valid, emphasizing that the Court of Appeal had erred in not considering the opinion of another doctor who had advised against proceeding with the surgical intervention. Furthermore, the Court clarified that the assessment of the causal link must focus on the harmful event suffered by the patient and not on the effectiveness of the intervention. The decision not to opt for conservative treatment could have prevented the permanent damage suffered by A. A.
Conclusions
Judgment No. 25825 of 2024 represents an important victory for patient rights in the context of medical liability. It highlights the importance of proper information from the doctor and the need to carefully evaluate the consequences of the therapeutic choice. This case also emphasizes how case law continues to evolve to protect patient rights and ensure that medical practices are always conducted in accordance with best practices and patient rights.
Bianucci Law Firm
We constantly follow regulatory and jurisprudential developments, offering updated analyses and innovative solutions. We share legal developments to foster a more informed legal culture.
Latest Articles
Categories
- administrative law (3)
- aesthetic damage (1)
- biological damage (1)
- bullying (3)
- burden of proof (1)
- case law (15)
- civil law (47)
- civil liability (40)
- civil_law (1)
- civil_liability (5)
- commercial law (1)
- compensation for damages (9)
- compensations (1)
- consumer law (1)
- contracts (1)
- Court of Cassation (1)
- Covid-19 (2)
- criminal law (5)
- criminal liability (1)
- Damage assessment (3)
- damage compensation (2)
- damages compensation (38)
- damages_compensation (10)
- employer_liability (1)
- employer_responsibility (1)
- European law (1)
- family law (4)
- family_law (3)
- financial law (1)
- health law (19)
- healthcare (2)
- healthcare law (1)
- healthcare liability (6)
- INAIL compensation (1)
- informed consent (2)
- inheritance law (1)
- insurance (5)
- insurance law (1)
- insurance_law (2)
- jurisdiction (1)
- jurisprudence (11)
- justice (1)
- labor law (21)
- labor_law (5)
- law of evidence (1)
- lease (1)
- legal expenses (1)
- liability (2)
- medical liability (13)
- medical malpractice (3)
- minors' rights (1)
- moral damage (3)
- neighboring rights (1)
- noise pollution (1)
- non-economic damage (1)
- Non-pecuniary damage (4)
- Occupational Disease (1)
- occupational diseases (4)
- occupational safety (1)
- occupational_diseases (1)
- prescription (1)
- prison system (1)
- private law (1)
- professional liability (19)
- property rights (1)
- protection of workers (1)
- protection of workers' rights (1)
- public administration (1)
- public administration liability (1)
- right to health (3)
- right to life (1)
- road accidents (5)
- self-determination (1)
- social security (2)
- social security law (1)
- statute of limitations (1)
- tax law (3)
- Tax litigation (1)
- technical consultancy (1)
- testimonial_evidence (1)
- tort law (4)
- tort liability (1)
- tourism law (1)
- wildlife (1)
- worker dignity (1)
- worker protection (1)
- workers' protection (1)
- workplace accidents (2)
- Workplace injuries (3)
- workplace safety (1)
Tags
Accident accident prevention law accidents accountant acoustic emissions active legitimacy art. 141 Insurance Code article 2087 civil code asbestos asbestos exposure biological damage blood transfusions burden of proof case law case_law Cassation Cassation ruling Catanzaro court catastrophic damage causal link childbirth civil law civil liability cohabitation compensatio lucri cum damno compensation compensation action compensation for damages compensation tables congenital malformations Consob Consumer Code contagion contractual liability corporate liability Court of Appeal Court of Cassation Court of Cassation 19744/2014 Covid-19 criminal law criminal liability damage assessment damage compensation damage evidence damages damages assessment damages compensation death diagnostic errors differential damage disability insurance dismissal emotional bond emotional bonds employer liability employer_liability equity evidence failure to supervise family law guidelines gynecologist HCV health law healthcare liability heating systems heirs hepatitis C virus I.N.A.I.L. iatrogenic damage iatrogenic injury INAIL income tax indemnity indemnity law informed consent injury from fall insurance insurance coverage insurance policies insurance policy intentional injuries joint liability judgment judgment 3767/2018 jurisdiction jurisprudence labor law landlord liability law law 194 legal expenses Legislative Decree 81/2008 legitimate reliance liability Lyell syndrome maintenance of public works malpractice Marche Region medical expenses medical liability medical malpractice medical negligence medical record mesothelioma Milan Court Milan ruling Ministry of Justice mobbing monetary penalty moral damage municipal liability Naples negligent arson newborn non-economic damage non-economic_damage non-pecuniary damage nosocomial infection nosocomial infections oath occupational disease occupational diseases occupational health package travel parental damage parental liability parental supervision passengers pension personal injuries personal injury pets premature birth professional liability property rights psychological suffering public administration public liability refusal of transfusion remedy Revenue Agency right to compensation right to health right to life road accident road accidents road traffic accidents ruling ruling 1361/2014 ruling 2023 ruling 5947 ruling Court of Naples safety safety of systems safety regulations self-determination settlement statute of limitations strepitus fori substitution Supreme Court Supreme Court 2023 Supreme Court ruling Supreme Court ruling 2023 surgical intervention survivor's pension survivors' pension tax law taxation technical consulting technical liability testimonial evidence tort liability traffic accident unjust detention unlawful occupation usufruct VAT water damage wildlife witness testimony Work work environment work-related liability. work-related stress worker health workers' rights workplace accident workplace accidents workplace injuries workplace safety