• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Risks and Responsibilities: Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Civil Section VI - 3, No. 32884 of 2021

The recent judgment of the Court of Cassation, No. 32884 of 2021, has highlighted the responsibilities of public entities regarding incidents caused by stray dogs. The case in question concerns an attack suffered by a citizen, C.A., from a stray dog, which led to a compensation claim against the Municipality of Pace del Mela and the Provincial Health Authority of Messina. The decision provides essential insights for understanding the burden of proof and liability in civil matters.

The Regulatory and Factual Context

The ruling is based on a series of regulations, including L.R. Sicily July 3, 2000, No. 15, which assigns municipalities the responsibility for overseeing stray dogs. In this case, the court found that the Municipality had failed to fulfill its duties, despite having received implicit reports about the presence of stray dogs in the area. This led to an acknowledgment of liability by the Court of Appeal of Messina, which upheld the Municipality's condemnation for compensation.

Liability for damages caused by stray dogs rests exclusively with the entities assigned by law the task of preventing the specific danger to the safety of the population.

Burden of Proof and Evidence Assessment

One of the most significant aspects of the ruling is the clarification regarding the burden of proof. In fact, the Court stated that, in the presence of regulatory obligations, it is the entity's responsibility to demonstrate that it has implemented the necessary preventive measures. In this case, the Municipality failed to prove that the stray dog capture service was operational and adequate.

  • The Municipality did not provide sufficient evidence to support its defense.
  • The Court found the reports from the local police inadequate, considering them unreliable.
  • Liability was attributed for the omission in implementing safety measures.

Conclusions

Judgment No. 32884 of 2021 not only clarifies the responsibilities of local entities regarding the oversight of stray dogs but also establishes an important precedent for similar cases. It emphasizes the importance of effective land management by public administrations to prevent risks to the population. Local entities must be aware of their responsibilities and act promptly to ensure the safety of citizens.