Commentary on Order No. 15699 of 06/05/2024: The Jurisdiction of the Consumer Court

Recently, the Court of Cassation issued Order No. 15699 on June 5, 2024, addressing a highly relevant issue in the context of jurisdiction: the non-derogable nature of the consumer court. This ruling not only clarifies the implications for professionals but also provides an in-depth reading of the Consumer Code and procedural norms.

The Context of the Ruling

The dispute between A. (ZAULI ARIELE) and C. (SALOGNI MICOL) has highlighted fundamental issues concerning civil jurisdiction and the specific provisions related to the consumer court, as set out in Article 33, paragraph 2, letter u), of the Consumer Code. The Court emphasized that the jurisdiction of the consumer court is non-derogable for professionals, thereby limiting their choice of forum.

Implications of the Ruling

Consumer court - Jurisdiction - Non-derogable nature by the professional - Applicability of Article 38, paragraph 2, of the Code of Civil Procedure - Exclusion - Consequences - Adherence to the exception - Irrelevance - Condemnation of costs - Necessity - Basis. The jurisdiction of the consumer court, as stated in Article 33, paragraph 2, letter u), of the Consumer Code, is configured as non-derogable by the professional, thus precluding the application of Article 38, paragraph 2, of the Code of Civil Procedure, with the consequence that any adherence to the opposing party's exception is irrelevant and that the order accepting the exception of incompetence must rule on costs, always having a decisive nature.

This maxim highlights several crucial aspects: first, the jurisdiction of the consumer court does not allow for exceptions, meaning that even if the professional and the consumer agree on another court, such an agreement is invalid. Furthermore, the order accepting an exception of incompetence must necessarily address legal costs, making this aspect a fundamental element in the decision-making process.

Final Considerations

  • The protection of consumers is at the center of Italian and European jurisprudence.
  • The jurisdiction of the consumer court offers essential protection for the weaker parties in the contractual relationship.
  • The implications of this order extend to all professionals interacting with consumers, requiring greater attention to choices of forum.

In conclusion, Order No. 15699 of 2024 represents an important step forward in safeguarding consumer rights, underscoring the importance of jurisdictional competence and reaffirming the central role of the consumer court. Professionals must be aware of these provisions to avoid disputes and ensure the correctness of their business practices.

Bianucci Law Firm