Commentary on Judgment No. 16654 of 2024: Standing in the Action for Annulment of Assembly Resolutions

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation No. 16654 dated 14/06/2024 provides a fundamental point of reflection for all those operating in the field of condominium law. In particular, the judgment focuses on the standing to act in the context of the action for annulment of assembly resolutions, clearly establishing that the status of condominium owner must exist both at the time of filing the application and at the time of the decision in the dispute.

The Regulatory Context

The issue addressed in the ruling finds its foundation in Article 1137 of the Civil Code, which governs the action for annulment of assembly resolutions. This article establishes the necessary prerequisites for a condominium owner to challenge a resolution. The Court reiterated that, in order to exercise this right, it is essential to maintain the status of condominium owner throughout the entire process, under penalty of losing the interest to act.

In general. In the context of condominiums, the action for annulment of the assembly resolution, governed by Article 1137 of the Civil Code, presupposes, as a requirement for standing, the existence of the status of condominium owner of the plaintiff both at the time of filing the application and at the time of the decision in the dispute, as the loss of such status generally results in the cessation of the applicant's interest in the annulment or modification of the organizational scope of the challenged resolution, unless they claim a right related to their past participation in the condominium and such right depends on the assessment of the legality of the resolution, or unless it continues to affect, derivatively, their assets.

The Implications of the Judgment

This ruling clarifies that standing to act is not merely a formal aspect but has significant practical implications. In fact, if a condominium owner loses their status as such, for example, due to the sale of the property, they can no longer challenge the resolutions unless they can demonstrate a right related to their previous participation. This implies that, in the event of a dispute regarding the legality of a resolution, the condominium owner must be able to demonstrate how it continues to affect their assets.

  • The status of condominium owner is essential for the action for annulment.
  • The loss of condominium owner status results in a lack of interest to act.
  • Exceptions for pre-existing rights linked to condominium participation.

Conclusions

In conclusion, ruling No. 16654 of 2024 represents an important step forward in clarifying the rules regarding condominium law. It emphasizes how standing to act is directly linked to the status of condominium owner, establishing an essential condition for those wishing to contest assembly resolutions. It is therefore crucial for condominium owners to be aware of this aspect, especially in conflict situations, to avoid finding themselves in a position of legal disadvantage.

Bianucci Law Firm