The ruling No. 11905 of 2020 by the Court of Cassation provides important insights into professional liability in the medical field and the operation of insurance policies. In this case, a doctor was denied indemnity by his insurance company after a patient sought compensation for damages arising from a surgical procedure. The Court reiterated the importance of transparency and communication in the stipulation of insurance contracts.
The doctor, D. P., had been sued for an arthroplasty procedure that led to complications, including an infection. The patient subsequently requested compensation for damages, alleging a supposed responsibility of the doctor and the healthcare facility. The central issue was whether the insurance policy taken out by the doctor covered such claims, considering that the infection had already manifested before the contract was signed.
The Court established that the policy was not operational for facts already known to the insured at the time of the stipulation.
This ruling highlights several fundamental aspects within the context of professional liability:
In conclusion, ruling No. 11905 of 2020 represents an important milestone in jurisprudence regarding professional liability insurance. It highlights the necessity for healthcare professionals to pay particular attention to the conditions of their policies and to communicate clearly and promptly any issues that may affect their operationality. Transparency and diligence are imperatives not only for the protection of patients but also for the protection of the professionals themselves.
We constantly follow regulatory and jurisprudential developments, offering updated analyses and innovative solutions. We share legal developments to foster a more informed legal culture.
Accident accident prevention law accidents accountant acoustic emissions active legitimacy art. 141 Insurance Code article 2087 civil code asbestos asbestos exposure biological damage blood transfusions burden of proof case law case_law Cassation Cassation ruling Catanzaro court catastrophic damage causal link childbirth civil law civil liability cohabitation compensatio lucri cum damno compensation compensation action compensation for damages compensation tables congenital malformations Consob Consumer Code contagion contractual liability corporate liability Court of Appeal Court of Cassation Court of Cassation 19744/2014 Covid-19 criminal law criminal liability damage assessment damage compensation damage evidence damages damages assessment damages compensation death diagnostic errors differential damage disability insurance dismissal emotional bond emotional bonds employer liability employer_liability equity evidence failure to supervise family law guidelines gynecologist HCV health law healthcare liability heating systems heirs hepatitis C virus I.N.A.I.L. iatrogenic damage iatrogenic injury INAIL income tax indemnity indemnity law informed consent injury from fall insurance insurance coverage insurance policies insurance policy intentional injuries joint liability judgment judgment 3767/2018 jurisdiction jurisprudence labor law landlord liability law law 194 legal expenses Legislative Decree 81/2008 legitimate reliance liability Lyell syndrome maintenance of public works malpractice Marche Region medical expenses medical liability medical malpractice medical negligence medical record mesothelioma Milan Court Milan ruling Ministry of Justice mobbing monetary penalty moral damage municipal liability Naples negligent arson newborn non-economic damage non-economic_damage non-pecuniary damage nosocomial infection nosocomial infections oath occupational disease occupational diseases occupational health package travel parental damage parental liability parental supervision passengers pension personal injuries personal injury pets premature birth professional liability property rights psychological suffering public administration public liability refusal of transfusion remedy Revenue Agency right to compensation right to health right to life road accident road accidents road traffic accidents ruling ruling 1361/2014 ruling 2023 ruling 5947 ruling Court of Naples safety safety of systems safety regulations self-determination settlement statute of limitations strepitus fori substitution Supreme Court Supreme Court 2023 Supreme Court ruling Supreme Court ruling 2023 surgical intervention survivor's pension survivors' pension tax law taxation technical consulting technical liability testimonial evidence tort liability traffic accident unjust detention unlawful occupation usufruct VAT water damage wildlife witness testimony Work work environment work-related liability. work-related stress worker health workers' rights workplace accident workplace accidents workplace injuries workplace safety