Cass. civ., Sez. III, Ord. n. 15913 of 2022: Analysis on Active Legitimacy in the Case of Usufruct
The recent order n. 15913 of the Court of Cassation, issued on May 18, 2022, provides important insights regarding the active legitimacy of usufructuaries in seeking compensation for damages suffered on assets entrusted to them. The central issue revolves around the ability of the usufructuary to take legal action to protect their rights, even in the absence of the bare owner, a topic of significant practical and legal interest.
The Case at Hand
In this specific case, the appellants M. G. and M. M. contested a ruling by the Court of Appeal of Naples that confirmed the order for compensation in favor of Ma. M. for the cutting of trees on a transferred property. The appellants argued that Ma. lacked active legitimacy as he was merely a usufructuary and not the owner of the damaged assets.
The Court reiterated that the usufructuary has the right to act for compensation for damages caused to the assets subject to their right, highlighting the need to protect their enjoyment.
Active Legitimacy and Protection of the Usufructuary
The Court of Cassation clarified that active legitimacy for the compensation action exists even when the person requesting compensation is merely a usufructuary. This is based on the principle that the violation of enjoyment rights implies a direct damage to the person exercising the usufruct. Therefore, the usufructuary can act against anyone who damages the asset, without the need to involve the bare owner.
Legal and Practical Implications
- Recognition of the active legitimacy of the usufructuary.
- Clarity on the distinction between active legitimacy and ownership of the right to compensation.
- Importance of ensuring the protection of the rights of those who enjoy the asset, in line with the provisions of the Italian Civil Code.
The ruling n. 15913 of 2022 also highlights how, in a remand trial, it is not possible to raise questions regarding the legitimacy of the parties if they have not already been addressed in previous proceedings. This principle of preclusion serves to ensure the stability of legal decisions and to limit uncertainty in legal relationships.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the ruling of the Court of Cassation offers an important clarification on the figure of the usufructuary and their ability to act to protect their rights. It marks a significant step in the protection of the rights of those exercising usufruct, ensuring greater legal certainty and adequate protection even in the absence of the bare owner. The decision is an important reference for Italian jurisprudence, helping to define the boundaries of active legitimacy in matters of compensation for damages.
Bianucci Law Firm
We constantly follow regulatory and jurisprudential developments, offering updated analyses and innovative solutions. We share legal developments to foster a more informed legal culture.
Latest Articles
Categories
- administrative law (3)
- aesthetic damage (1)
- biological damage (1)
- bullying (3)
- burden of proof (1)
- case law (15)
- civil law (47)
- civil liability (40)
- civil_law (1)
- civil_liability (5)
- commercial law (1)
- compensation for damages (9)
- compensations (1)
- consumer law (1)
- contracts (1)
- Court of Cassation (1)
- Covid-19 (2)
- criminal law (5)
- criminal liability (1)
- Damage assessment (3)
- damage compensation (2)
- damages compensation (38)
- damages_compensation (10)
- employer_liability (1)
- employer_responsibility (1)
- European law (1)
- family law (4)
- family_law (3)
- financial law (1)
- health law (19)
- healthcare (2)
- healthcare law (1)
- healthcare liability (6)
- INAIL compensation (1)
- informed consent (2)
- inheritance law (1)
- insurance (5)
- insurance law (1)
- insurance_law (2)
- jurisdiction (1)
- jurisprudence (11)
- justice (1)
- labor law (21)
- labor_law (5)
- law of evidence (1)
- lease (1)
- legal expenses (1)
- liability (2)
- medical liability (13)
- medical malpractice (3)
- minors' rights (1)
- moral damage (3)
- neighboring rights (1)
- noise pollution (1)
- non-economic damage (1)
- Non-pecuniary damage (4)
- Occupational Disease (1)
- occupational diseases (4)
- occupational safety (1)
- occupational_diseases (1)
- prescription (1)
- prison system (1)
- private law (1)
- professional liability (19)
- property rights (1)
- protection of workers (1)
- protection of workers' rights (1)
- public administration (1)
- public administration liability (1)
- right to health (3)
- right to life (1)
- road accidents (5)
- self-determination (1)
- social security (2)
- social security law (1)
- statute of limitations (1)
- tax law (3)
- Tax litigation (1)
- technical consultancy (1)
- testimonial_evidence (1)
- tort law (4)
- tort liability (1)
- tourism law (1)
- wildlife (1)
- worker dignity (1)
- worker protection (1)
- workers' protection (1)
- workplace accidents (2)
- Workplace injuries (3)
- workplace safety (1)
Tags
Accident accident prevention law accidents accountant acoustic emissions active legitimacy art. 141 Insurance Code article 2087 civil code asbestos asbestos exposure biological damage blood transfusions burden of proof case law case_law Cassation Cassation ruling Catanzaro court catastrophic damage causal link childbirth civil law civil liability cohabitation compensatio lucri cum damno compensation compensation action compensation for damages compensation tables congenital malformations Consob Consumer Code contagion contractual liability corporate liability Court of Appeal Court of Cassation Court of Cassation 19744/2014 Covid-19 criminal law criminal liability damage assessment damage compensation damage evidence damages damages assessment damages compensation death diagnostic errors differential damage disability insurance dismissal emotional bond emotional bonds employer liability employer_liability equity evidence failure to supervise family law guidelines gynecologist HCV health law healthcare liability heating systems heirs hepatitis C virus I.N.A.I.L. iatrogenic damage iatrogenic injury INAIL income tax indemnity indemnity law informed consent injury from fall insurance insurance coverage insurance policies insurance policy intentional injuries joint liability judgment judgment 3767/2018 jurisdiction jurisprudence labor law landlord liability law law 194 legal expenses Legislative Decree 81/2008 legitimate reliance liability Lyell syndrome maintenance of public works malpractice Marche Region medical expenses medical liability medical malpractice medical negligence medical record mesothelioma Milan Court Milan ruling Ministry of Justice mobbing monetary penalty moral damage municipal liability Naples negligent arson newborn non-economic damage non-economic_damage non-pecuniary damage nosocomial infection nosocomial infections oath occupational disease occupational diseases occupational health package travel parental damage parental liability parental supervision passengers pension personal injuries personal injury pets premature birth professional liability property rights psychological suffering public administration public liability refusal of transfusion remedy Revenue Agency right to compensation right to health right to life road accident road accidents road traffic accidents ruling ruling 1361/2014 ruling 2023 ruling 5947 ruling Court of Naples safety safety of systems safety regulations self-determination settlement statute of limitations strepitus fori substitution Supreme Court Supreme Court 2023 Supreme Court ruling Supreme Court ruling 2023 surgical intervention survivor's pension survivors' pension tax law taxation technical consulting technical liability testimonial evidence tort liability traffic accident unjust detention unlawful occupation usufruct VAT water damage wildlife witness testimony Work work environment work-related liability. work-related stress worker health workers' rights workplace accident workplace accidents workplace injuries workplace safety