Analysis of Judgment No. 10925 of 2024: Possessory Action and its Relationship with Petitory Action

The recent ruling No. 10925 of April 23, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications regarding the relationship between possessory action and petitory action. In particular, the Court emphasizes that the acceptance of a request in the possessory action does not require the assessment of the legitimacy of possession but focuses on a mere factual situation. This aspect is fundamental for understanding the dynamics of actions defending possession and their legal consequences.

The Distinction Between Possessory and Petitory Actions

In Italian law, possessory actions and petitory actions have distinct purposes and requirements. While possessory actions (art. 1168 of the Civil Code) aim to protect possession of an asset, petitory actions (art. 2909 of the Civil Code) serve to assert ownership. The ordinance in question clarifies that the judgment formed on a possessory request has no effect in the petitory action, precisely because the possession useful for adverse possession requires criteria that are not considered in possessory proceedings.

The Court's Maxim and Its Meaning

Effectiveness in the Petitory Action - Absence. In the possessory action, the acceptance of the request is independent of the assessment of the legitimacy of possession, as it aims to protect a mere factual situation having the external characteristics of ownership or another real right. It follows that the judgment formed on the possessory request is devoid of effectiveness in the petitory action concerning the ascertainment of the acquisition of the aforementioned right by adverse possession, since the possession useful for adverse possession must have requirements that are not relevant in possessory judgments.

This maxim is of particular importance as it clarifies that the possessory action focuses on the protection of current possession, while the petitory action deals with ownership rights. Consequently, a possible ruling in favor of a possessory action does not automatically establish a right of ownership. This principle is essential to avoid conflicts between the two types of actions and to ensure the correct application of the law.

Conclusions

Judgment No. 10925 of 2024 represents an important reference for understanding the dynamics between possession and ownership in Italian law. The distinctions clarified by the Court of Cassation provide useful tools for legal practitioners, enabling them to orient their legal strategies more effectively. It is therefore essential to have a clear understanding of the difference between possessory and petitory actions, especially in litigation contexts, to avoid misunderstandings and ensure adequate protection of real rights.

Bianucci Law Firm