Commentary on Judgment No. 9936 of 2024: Coverage Limits in RCA Insurance

Judgment No. 9936 of April 12, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation, represents an important reference point for understanding the coverage limits in the field of automobile liability insurance (RCA). The Court addressed the issue of deferring the adjustment of the minimum coverage limits, clearly establishing the legitimacy of such deferral even in the absence of timely transposition of Directive 2005/14/EC.

The Regulatory Context

Directive 2005/14/EC introduced the possibility for member states to raise the minimum coverage limits for RCA insurance, granting a transitional period of five years. The Court clarified that, although the transposition of the directive occurred late, this did not prevent the legitimacy of deferring the adjustment to the minimum limits. In other words, member states have the authority to extend the deadlines for adjustment without this constituting a violation of European provisions.

The Implications of the Judgment

by granting member states the authority to provide for a transitional period of five years within which to raise the amount of the minimum coverage limits of RCA insurance - it did not condition this authority on its timely transposition, with the result that Legislative Decree No. 198 of 2007, while tardily transposing the aforementioned Directive, legitimately deferred the adjustment of the minimum limits within the deadlines it provided (December 11, 2009, for raising the limit to 2.5 million euros and June 11, 2012, for raising the limit to 5 million euros); therefore, the indemnity obligation of the company designated by the Compensation Fund for Road Victims, for accidents occurring until December 10, 2009, remains limited to the limit provided by Presidential Decree April 19, 1993.

This statement is crucial for understanding the limits of the indemnity obligations of the insurance companies designated by the Compensation Fund for Road Victims. In fact, for accidents occurring until December 10, 2009, the indemnities are based on the limits provided by Presidential Decree April 19, 1993, and not on those subsequently raised.

Conclusions

The judgment under examination offers a clear interpretation of the rules regarding the coverage limits of RCA insurance, emphasizing the importance of understanding the deadlines and modalities for transposing European directives. For citizens and professionals in the sector, it is essential to be aware of these provisions to better manage disputes related to accidents. With this decision, the Court of Cassation has provided an important clarification that could influence future cases regarding compensation for damages from road accidents.

Bianucci Law Firm