Analysis of Judgment No. 16199 of 2024: Civil Liability and Omissive Conduct

Judgment No. 16199 of June 11, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation, serves as an important reference point regarding civil liability for healthcare activities, particularly concerning omissive conduct. The ruling reiterated the importance of the causal link in determining the responsibility of healthcare professionals, establishing precise criteria for assessing damages resulting from omissions. This is a critical aspect, especially in a context where trust in healthcare services is fundamental.

The Causal Link in Omissive Conduct

The principle expressed by the ruling establishes that:

Omissive conduct - Causal link - Assessment - Logical probability criterion - Scope - "More likely than not" criterion - Distinction. In matters of liability for healthcare activities, the assessment of the causal link in cases of omissive conduct must be carried out according to a logical probability criterion, determining whether the omitted duty of care would have been able to prevent the harmful event or not, taking into account all the findings of the specific case, based on a judgment anchored not only to the quantitative-statistical determination of the frequency of events but also to the elements of confirmation and the exclusion of alternative ones, available in the specific case; thus, it is not a different evidentiary criterion from that of "more likely than not," used in civil judgments, but rather an expression of a substantial assessment of the material causal link.

This principle clarifies that, in cases of omissive conduct, the judge must evaluate whether the omission of a specific behavior could have actually prevented a harmful event. This is not merely a statistical analysis, but a comprehensive examination of the specific circumstances of the case. This approach is fundamental to ensuring fair justice, avoiding convictions based on assumptions or mere automatism.

Implications for Healthcare Professionals

The implications of this ruling for healthcare professionals are significant. In particular, it suggests that:

  • It is essential to document every step of the clinical decision-making process.
  • Continuous training and professional updating can reduce the risk of omissions.
  • Consultation with colleagues and specialists is useful to ensure that decisions are made based on the best available practices.

In a context of increasing attention to professional liability, having clear guidelines provided by jurisprudence becomes crucial to avoid litigation and to protect one's profession.

Conclusions

Judgment No. 16199 of 2024 represents a step forward in defining the criteria for liability in cases of omissive conduct in the healthcare field. It offers clear guidance on how to evaluate the causal link, emphasizing the importance of an approach based on concrete evidence and logical analysis. For healthcare professionals, understanding and applying these principles is not only a legal matter but also an ethical responsibility towards patients and the community.

Bianucci Law Firm