Jurisdiction of the Justice of the Peace in Creditor Claims: Commentary on Ordinance No. 15639 of 2024

The recent ordinance no. 15639 of June 4, 2024, from the Court of Cassation has raised important questions regarding jurisdiction in disputes related to creditor claims arising from lease contracts. This ruling is situated within a legal context where the distinction between the competencies of the justice of the peace and the court is fundamental to ensure effective administration of justice.

The Context of the Ruling

In the case at hand, the Court addressed the issue of jurisdiction, establishing that creditor claims originating from a lease contract, even if the amount does not exceed five thousand euros, do not fall under the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace. This principle is of great relevance, as it implies that such disputes must necessarily be handled by the court.

“Creditor claims arising from a lease relationship - Amount within the limit set by Article 7, paragraph 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure - Exclusion of the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace - Case. In relation to creditor claims originating from a lease contract, even if the amount does not exceed the limit of five thousand euros as set by Article 7, paragraph 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure, the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace must be excluded, as it concerns a matter reserved for the jurisdiction of the court. (In this case, the Supreme Court affirmed the jurisdiction of the court in relation to an action for recovery of undue payments related to condominium charges paid by the tenant).”

Reflections on Jurisdiction

The ruling clarifies that the jurisdiction of the court is not only a matter of value but also of legal nature. The Court, in line with previous rulings, reiterates the importance of ensuring adequate handling of lease disputes, as they may involve complex issues related to the rights and duties of both landlords and tenants.

  • Recognition of the complexity of disputes in leasing matters.
  • Exclusion of the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace to ensure greater specialization in judgment.
  • Practical implications for legal professionals and for landlords and tenants.

Conclusions

Ordinance no. 15639 of 2024 represents an important step forward in clarifying jurisdictional competencies regarding lease contracts. The Court of Cassation, with this decision, has not only established clear limits for the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace but has also highlighted the importance of addressing lease disputes with the attention they deserve, so that the rights of the parties are adequately protected. It is essential that those involved in such disputes rely on experienced professionals who can guide them to the correct competent forum.

Bianucci Law Firm