Commentary on Order No. 19226 of 12/07/2024: Aspects of the Summary Judgment Procedure

With Order No. 19226 of July 12, 2024, the Court addressed a crucial issue concerning the summary judgment procedure, particularly regarding the presentation and submission of evidence. This ruling offers significant insights for lawyers and legal practitioners, clarifying the consequences of failing to indicate the means of proof and documents.

The Context of the Ruling

The case at hand concerns the appeal filed by C. (Cipullo Paola) against C. and took place at the Court of Santa Maria Capua Vetere. The Court highlighted that in the summary judgment procedure, there is no procedural sanction for the failure to specifically indicate the means of proof and documents by the appellant or the respondent. This aspect is fundamental as it allows for greater flexibility in managing evidence, avoiding barriers that could limit the right of defense.

The Implications of the Ruling

The Court stated that the submission of documents after the filing of the first defense act is admissible, up until the pronouncement of the order referred to in Article 702-ter of the Italian Civil Procedure Code. This means that the parties can present additional evidence even after the initial phase of the trial, thus ensuring that every relevant aspect can be considered. This approach aims to guarantee a fair trial, in line with the principles of justice and defense.

Summary judgment procedure - Introductory acts - Omission of specific indication and/or submission of means of proof and documents - Preclusions - Non-existence - Consequences. In the context of the summary judgment procedure, since no procedural sanction is contemplated for failing to meet the requirement of specific indication of the means of proof and documents that the appellant and the respondent intend to rely on, nor for the failure to submit said documents with the appeal or the response, the submission of documents after the filing of the first defense act and up until the pronouncement of the order referred to in Article 702-ter of the Italian Civil Procedure Code is admissible.

Conclusions

This Order represents an important clarification for lawyers and parties involved in summary judgment procedures. The ability to submit additional documentation even after the initial defense act allows for a smoother management of disputes. With this decision, the Court demonstrates particular attention to the rights of defense and the necessity to ensure that all relevant evidence can be timely presented. It is essential for legal professionals to be informed about these developments in order to best protect the interests of their clients.

Bianucci Law Firm