Commentary on the Ordinance Judgment No. 10212 of 2024: The Justification of Sanctions by Consob

The recent Ordinance No. 10212 of April 16, 2024, issued by the Court of Cassation and presided over by Dr. M. F., brings to light important clarifications regarding the justification of administrative sanctions issued by Consob. This ruling not only fits into the framework of sanctions provided for by Article 195 of the TUF but also offers insights into transparency and the right to access public documents.

The Context of the Ruling

The case in question involves an appeal filed by D. (S. C.) against a decision of the Court of Appeal of Venice. The central issue was related to the validity of the decree imposing a sanction, justified by reference. The Court confirmed that such a method of justification is admissible, provided that specific conditions are met, such as a precise reference to the details of the sanctions office act.

The Justification by Reference

Generally, regarding administrative sanctions issued by Consob, the decree imposing the sanction may be justified by reference through a referral to the act of the sanctions office containing the proposal, without the need to reiterate its justification, as long as the aforementioned act is referenced with a precise indication of its details, made available to the interested parties, according to the methods governing the right of access to documents of public administration, and it is highlighted that the defensive arguments presented by the appellant have been examined.

This maxim highlights the importance of a clear and transparent justification that allows interested parties to understand the reasons for the sanction. The Court emphasized that the right of access must be guaranteed, thus reinforcing the principle of legality and the right to defense.

Implications of the Ruling

The Court's decision represents a significant step for jurisprudence regarding administrative sanctions. Among the most relevant implications, we can list:

  • Recognition of the validity of justification by reference, which simplifies the sanctioning process.
  • Need to ensure access to documents, strengthening the rights of interested parties.
  • Importance of a thorough examination of defensive arguments to guarantee a fair trial.

This ruling, therefore, not only clarifies the methods of applying sanctions by Consob but also fits into a broader context where transparency and respect for citizens' fundamental rights are at the heart of administrative action.

Conclusions

In conclusion, Ordinance No. 10212 of 2024 represents a milestone in the landscape of administrative sanctions in Italy. The Court of Cassation has reaffirmed the importance of a clear and accessible justification, stating that respecting the rights of all involved parties is fundamental for the legitimacy of administrative decisions. With this ruling, a future is hoped for in which transparency and fairness are increasingly at the center of the actions of Consob and other supervisory authorities.

Bianucci Law Firm