Analysis of Judgment No. 9450 of 2024: The Importance of Relevance in the Appeal to the Supreme Court

The recent order No. 9450 of April 9, 2024, issued by the Supreme Court, provides significant insights into the correct formulation of the appeal to the Supreme Court. In particular, the judgment clarifies the importance of the relevance between the objections presented and the "decisum" of the contested judgment, establishing that the absence of such relevance leads to the inadmissibility of the appeal itself.

The Legal Context of the Judgment

The Supreme Court, presided over by M. Mocci and with rapporteur S. Oliva, analyzed the appeal filed by D. (C. F.) against D. (O. S.). The central point of the dispute concerns the presentation of objections lacking specific relevance to the decisum of the contested judgment. The Court, recalling Article 360 of the Code of Civil Procedure, emphasized that the lack of coherence between the grounds for the appeal and the issues previously addressed renders the appeal inadmissible.

Appeal to the Supreme Court - Objections - Relevance to the "decisum" of the contested judgment - Necessity - Defect - Consequences - Inadmissibility. The submission, by means of an appeal to the Supreme Court, of objections lacking specific relevance to the decisum of the contested judgment, results in the inadmissibility of the appeal, resolving into a non-reason.

The Consequences of Inadmissibility

The consequences of the inadmissibility of the appeal are significant. In fact, the appellant finds themselves unable to effectively challenge the decision of the Court of Appeal of Bologna, which had already examined the case. This can limit the possibilities of obtaining a review of the judgment, highlighting the importance of adequate preparation and a clear exposition of the grounds for appeal.

Conclusions

In conclusion, judgment No. 9450 of 2024 reiterates a fundamental principle of civil procedure: the importance of the relevance of objections to the decisum. Legal professionals must pay attention to this requirement, as the formulation of an appeal to the Supreme Court requires careful preparation and a clear strategy. Only in this way can it be ensured that claims for justice are heard and considered by the competent courts.

Bianucci Law Firm