Analysis of Judgment No. 17418 of 2023: Demolition Order and Automatic Acquisition into the Municipal Heritage

The recent Judgment No. 17418 of April 4, 2023, issued by the Court of Cassation, has raised important questions regarding non-compliance with demolition orders in the context of illegal construction. In particular, the Court confirmed that the failure to execute such orders within the established term of ninety days leads to the automatic acquisition of the illegal work and the relevant area into the municipal heritage, without the need for further notifications.

The Regulatory Context

The judgment fits into a regulatory framework already clarified by the Presidential Decree of June 6, 2001, No. 380, which regulates construction in Italy. In particular, Article 31 provides that, in the event of a situation of illegal construction, the administrative authority may issue a demolition order. The judgment reaffirms this principle, highlighting how the timing for the execution of the order is essential for the protection of the territory and urban planning.

The Maxim of the Judgment

Demolition order - Non-compliance - Expiration of the 90-day term - Automatic acquisition of the work and the area into the municipal heritage - Notification of the assessment of such non-compliance - Necessity - Exclusion - Reasons. The unjustified non-compliance with the order to demolish the illegal work and to restore the state of the places within ninety days from the notification of the demolition injunction issued by the administrative authority results in the automatic free acquisition into the municipal heritage of the work and the relevant area, regardless of the notification to the interested party of the formal assessment of non-compliance.

This maxim underscores a crucial aspect: non-compliance with the demolition order produces immediate and automatic effects. It is not necessary for the municipal authority to further notify the assessment of such non-compliance. This provision aims to ensure a swift resolution of illegal construction situations, protecting public heritage and the urban planning of cities.

Practical Implications and Conclusions

The implications of this judgment are manifold. First of all, it places a strong emphasis on the responsibility of owners of illegal properties, who must act promptly to comply with demolition orders. Otherwise, they face not only the loss of their property but also the possibility that it will be acquired by the municipality without compensation.

  • Clarity in demolition procedures
  • Strengthening of regulations against illegal construction
  • Protection of public heritage

In conclusion, Judgment No. 17418 of 2023 represents an important step towards greater effectiveness in the fight against illegal construction. It is essential that citizens understand the consequences of their actions regarding construction and act in compliance with current regulations.

Bianucci Law Firm