Understanding Compensation for Damages: Key Insights and Cases

This section is dedicated to exploring the intricacies of damage compensation. Here, you will find a collection of articles, legal rulings, and in-depth analyses that shed light on the various aspects of compensation for damages, helping you navigate this complex area of law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Compensation to the contractor: analysis of Ordinance No. 16346 of 2024.

Discover how the Court of Cassation has established the criteria for calculating compensation in the event of unilateral withdrawal from the construction contract. A useful insight for professionals and entrepreneurs.

Bianucci Law Firm
Usurpatory and Appropriative Occupation: Commentary on Judgment No. 18222 of 2024

Let's analyze the recent Order No. 18222 of 2024, which clarifies the distinction between usurpative and appropriative occupation, and the possibility of requalifying compensation claims. Discover how case law has evolved in the field of expropriation for public utility.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 16289 of 2024: Guarantee and Good Faith.

The Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of the creditor's liability in case of failure to pursue the guarantor, establishing that good faith cannot be invoked without specific objections.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 15804 of 2024: The Importance of Reasoning in Technical Consulting.

Judgment No. 15804 of 2024 clarifies the judge's obligation to provide reasoning when accepting the conclusions of the court-appointed expert report, highlighting the consequences of a lack of adequate justification.

Bianucci Law Firm
Interpretation of Administrative Acts: Analysis of Judgment No. 15367 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation offers important insights into the interpretation of non-normative administrative acts, highlighting the criteria for reviewability and the importance of adequate reasoning. Let's explore the details together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Order No. 20036 of 2024: ordinary jurisdiction and damages compensation.

Let’s analyze order no. 20036 of July 22, 2024, which clarifies the jurisdiction of the ordinary judge in the event of a claim for damages following a negative vote by the Revenue Agency in a preventive agreement.

Bianucci Law Firm
Italian jurisdiction in cases of contracts with Swiss credit institutions: commentary on order no. 18636 of 2024.

Order No. 18636 of 2024 clarifies the jurisdiction of the Italian judge for actions for contractual liability against Swiss credit institutions, highlighting the principle of directing the activity towards Italy.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 16136 of 2024: Immunity of the People's Republic of China and Italian Jurisdiction

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of Italian jurisdiction against foreign States for acts performed iure imperii, excluding compensation claims against China for the Covid-19 pandemic.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 25059 of 2023: The Role of Common Knowledge and Presumptions in Defamation.

Judgment No. 25059 of 2023 clarifies the legitimacy of the use of notoriety and presumptions in proving damages for defamation, highlighting the importance of reputation and compensation for moral suffering.

Bianucci Law Firm
Liability of the custodian: commentary on ruling no. 51452 of 2023

The recent ruling no. 51452 of 2023 clarifies the duties of a custodian of goods in relation to liability for negligence, highlighting how even those who are not owners can be held responsible for harmful events.