Welcome to our page dedicated to judgment in legal practice. Here you can find a wealth of articles, court rulings, and analysis on this important legal topic. Stay informed and deepen your understanding of judgment in the legal field.
Let us analyze ruling no. 38513 of 2024, which clarifies the admissibility of the civil party constitution in the case of plea bargaining and the related consequences on legal costs.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the criteria for the revocation of the renewal of evidence, highlighting the importance of a coherent and detailed rationale from the appellate judge.
The ruling no. 39603 of 2024 provides important clarifications on the regulatory continuity regarding the damage to cultural heritage, highlighting the existence of different offenses and their specific cases. Let’s explore together the meaning of this ruling.
Let’s examine ruling no. 37474 of 2024, which clarifies that a property disposition act does not necessarily need to have legal nature to constitute the crime of fraud. Let’s explore the legal and practical implications of this decision.
The ruling no. 37081 of 2024 provides important insights into the criteria for granting rehabilitation, highlighting the importance of fulfilling civil obligations arising from crimes. Let’s explore the meaning of this decision together.
Let us explore the very recent ruling no. 36919 of 2024, which addresses the compatibility of the rules regarding probation for individuals on therapeutic programs with constitutional principles.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the issue of the competence of the remanding judge, highlighting the conditions for review in the case of new facts. Let’s explore the meaning of these legal provisions together.
The ruling no. 38638 of 2024 provides important clarifications regarding the jurisdiction of the enforcement judge in cases of oppositions declared inadmissible due to manifest unfoundedness, highlighting the need for conversion into a petition for cassation.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies that the mistake regarding the legality of conduct is not excusable if based on unofficial opinions. An important decision for the protection of public safety.
The ruling of the Supreme Court provides significant insights into the configuration of corruption and extortion, highlighting the corrupt mechanisms and the criminal responsibilities of public officials involved in acts contrary to their official duties.