Learn about the intricacies of compensation in legal matters with our collection of articles and judgments on the subject.
In this article, we analyze ruling no. 1234 of 2023, highlighting its legal implications and the legal principles that arise from it, for a comprehensive and accessible understanding.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of insurance coverage for damages caused by pets, with particular reference to damages inflicted on non-cohabiting parents. An in-depth analysis of the decision and its legal implications on the matter.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation provides fundamental insights on the employer's liability in cases of damage resulting from unfavorable working conditions. It delves into the burden of proof and the correlation between illness and the work environment.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2019 provides important clarifications on the compensation for property damages in the event of death and on the issue of offsetting between INAIL pension and compensation. Let’s explore the details and legal implications.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the boundary between commuting accidents and work activities, highlighting the importance of the functionality of the route. A judgment that provides relevant insights for workers and employers.
The ruling no. 19864 of 2014 of the Court of Cassation clarifies the principles related to professional liability in the medical field and the assessment of non-pecuniary damages, highlighting the importance of personalizing the damage and the need for fair and full compensation.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the burden of proof in cases of medical liability, reiterating the importance of a thorough assessment of the safety measures adopted by healthcare facilities.
Analysis of the ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the principles of liability in cases of medical malpractice, highlighting the importance of the distinction between biological damage and pre-existing disability.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important insights into witness testimony and civil liability, clarifying the limits on claims for non-economic damages.
The Court of Cassation clarifies the role of the Marche Region in liability for damages caused by wildlife, establishing important principles regarding passive legitimacy and the burden of proof.