Judgment in Legal Practice: Articles, Sentences, and Analysis

Welcome to our page dedicated to judgment in legal practice. Here you can find a wealth of articles, court rulings, and analysis on this important legal topic. Stay informed and deepen your understanding of judgment in the legal field.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 19726 of 17/07/2024: Irreproachable Conduct and Registration in the Bar Association.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarified the limits of impeccable conduct for registration in the bar association, highlighting the importance of the presumption of innocence and the analysis of conduct over time.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 19456 of 15/07/2024: Judgment and Jurisdiction Against Foreigners

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation establishes important principles on external res judicata and jurisdiction, clarifying how decisions of foreign courts can influence subsequent national litigation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Exclusive jurisdiction in ruling no. 19299 of 2024: an analysis of the Court of Justice.

Judgment No. 19299 of July 12, 2024 provides important clarifications on jurisdiction in European school disputes, establishing the role of the Appeals Chamber under the Luxembourg Convention.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Order No. 16784 of 17/06/2024: Reflections on Jurisdiction and Administration of the Process.

Let's analyze the recent Order No. 16784 of 2024, which clarifies the nature of procedural administrative acts and their impact on jurisdiction. We will explore the legal consequences and remedies for the parties involved.

Bianucci Law Firm
Jurisdiction of the Ordinary Judge in Consortium Credit: Ruling No. 16125 of 2024

The recent ruling no. 16125 of 2024 clarifies the role of the ordinary judge in the proceedings for the verification of consortium credits, emphasizing the private nature of consortia for the defense of intensive productions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 24598 of 2023: Qualification of Public Agent and Private Law Regime of IPAB.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the distinction between employees of IPAB operating under private law and the qualification of public agent, with significant implications for criminal law and the liability of public officials.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 24616 of 2023: Autonomy in Criminal Precaution and Preventive Measures

Judgment No. 24616 of 2023 clarifies the delicate balance between criminal caution and preventive measures, highlighting the autonomy of evaluations and the importance of the danger assessment.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 24321 of 2023: Notifications in Immediate Judgment.

Judgment no. 24321 of 2023 clarifies the obligation to notify the decree of immediate judgment only to the defendant, highlighting the differences compared to the notification to the defense attorney. Let us explore the significance of this decision and its implications in criminal procedural law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 25375 of 2023: Appeal and Rehabilitation in Personal Preventive Measures.

Let's explore the recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Catania regarding the rehabilitation of personal preventive measures and the implications of challenging the provisions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Prohibition of proximity to the victim: commentary on ruling no. 24351 of 2023

Let's examine the recent ruling no. 24351 of 2023, which clarifies the prohibition of approach as an accessory measure to the removal from the family home, highlighting the importance of protecting victims in contexts of violence.