Shared custody and transfer abroad: commentary on the ruling of the Court of Cassation, Ord. No. 26697/2023

The ruling of the Court of Cassation No. 26697 of 2023 offers important insights regarding the dynamics of child custody, especially when one parent decides to move abroad. In this case, the Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal of Trieste, which had authorized the transfer of the minor C.C. to Israel with her mother, B.B., emphasizing the importance of ensuring her primary interest.

The context of the ruling

The case involved a dispute between A.A. and B.B. regarding the custody of their daughter C.C., born in 2014. The Court of Appeal had deemed the mother to be the primary caregiver and that the move to Israel was justified by legitimate reasons, such as seeking family support and job opportunities. This aspect was central to the judgment, as the well-being of the minor has always been considered a priority.

The Court excluded that the mother’s decision to move to Israel was an expression of indifference towards her daughter's needs.

The principle of the child's superior interest

The principle of the superior interest of the child, established by Article 337-ter of the Civil Code, guided the Court in its decision. The assessment of parental suitability took into account not only the mother's caregiving and support capabilities but also the necessity of maintaining a stable and continuous relationship with both parents. Despite the objections raised by the father, the Court concluded that the move would not compromise this relationship.

  • The mother demonstrated having solid family support in Israel.
  • The child has always lived with the mother, who has been the primary reference figure.
  • No elements emerged indicating obstacles to paternal visitation.

Conclusions on the ruling

In conclusion, the ruling No. 26697/2023 of the Court of Cassation represents a clear application of legal principles regarding child custody. It highlights how the relocation of one parent abroad should not automatically compromise the rights of the other parent, provided that emotional ties and the child's interest are safeguarded. The Court successfully balanced the needs of both parents, confirming that, although the move may create difficulties, there are insufficient reasons to deny the possibility of shared custody.

Conclusions

In light of what has been examined, it is essential for parents to always consider the child's interest in their decisions, especially in conflict situations. Jurisprudence continues to evolve, but the well-being of children must remain at the center of every assessment.

Bianucci Law Firm