Welcome to our page dedicated to exploring the concept of justice in legal practice. Here you will find a curated selection of articles, cases, and insights that delve into the various aspects of justice within jurisprudence.
Let us analyze ruling no. 20957 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the procedures for holding hearings in appeals in the context of emergency measures for COVID-19, highlighting the importance of holding them 'in person'.
Analysis of the ruling no. 22963 of 2023 by the Juvenile Court regarding the early conclusion of the proceedings and the correct observance of the rules on adversarial proceedings.
The recent ruling no. 26628 of 2024 provides important insights into the legitimacy of life imprisonment for the crime of political massacre and the possibility of modulating sentences based on the severity of the act. Let us explore together the legal and constitutional implications of this decision.
Analysis of ruling no. 25853 of 2024 concerning extradition to Ecuador, focusing on the assessment of serious indications of guilt and the importance of the bilateral treaty.
The Court of Appeal of Genoa rules on the applicability of substitute penalties, clarifying the methods for obtaining the consent of the defendant and the conditions for their application in the second-instance trial.
The ruling no. 27654 of 2024 provides important insights into the management of European Arrest Warrants, clarifying the competences of the Court of Appeal and the limitations regarding parallel proceedings.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies that foreign EU citizens not residing in Italy do not need to present a tax code to obtain state-sponsored legal aid, an important legislative development.
Analysis of ruling no. 29723 of 2024 concerning the prohibition of the prevalence of generic mitigating circumstances over repeated recidivism, highlighting the constitutional implications and the balancing of penal provisions.
This ruling highlights how the violation of international protocols in DNA analysis can compromise the entire criminal process, rendering the results unusable as evidence.
Let’s explore the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the role of the trial judge in the interpretation of communicative facts and the validity of the motivations related to the identification of the individuals involved.