Commentary on the ruling of the Court of Cassation, Civil Section III, No. 26127 of 2024: Revocability of Property Acts in Separation

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation, No. 26127 of 2024, provides important clarifications regarding the revocability of property acts between spouses in the context of separations. In particular, the Court addressed procedural legitimacy and the possibility of pursuing revocation actions concerning property transfers made during separation.

Context of the Ruling

The case originated from a revocation action proposed by MPS Gestione Crediti against A.A. and his ex-wife B.B., concerning a real estate transfer that occurred following a separation agreement. The Court of Appeal of Genoa had accepted the action, deeming that the transfer was detrimental to the creditors. A.A. then appealed to the Court of Cassation, arguing that the transfer was not revocable as it occurred in fulfillment of an obligation stemming from a separation decree.

The Court of Cassation reaffirmed the possibility of pursuing a revocation action even concerning transfer acts resulting from consensual separation agreements.

The Decisions of the Court of Cassation

  • The Court confirmed that the transfer of real estate between spouses, even if carried out during separation, can be subject to revocation action if it harms creditors.
  • It was emphasized that awareness of the harm caused to creditors is not necessary if the act is classified as a gratuitous act.
  • The procedural legitimacy of the assignee was clarified, establishing that the bulk assignment of receivables does not preclude the possibility of pursuing revocation actions.

Practical Implications of the Ruling

This ruling has significant implications for the parties involved in separation proceedings and for creditors. In particular, the Court highlighted how procedural legitimacy can be remedied during the process, avoiding the growth of procedural formalism that could hinder the right of access to justice. Furthermore, the recognition of the validity of revocation actions regarding property acts between spouses underscores the importance of protecting creditors from potentially harmful acts against their property guarantees.

Conclusions

Ultimately, the ruling No. 26127 of 2024 offers an important opportunity for reflection on the delicate balance between the rights of spouses during separation and the necessity of protecting creditors' rights. Jurisprudence continues to evolve in this area, providing useful guidelines for managing property disputes in the family context.

Bianucci Law Firm