Discover insightful articles and judgments on legal defense in various cases on the Bianucci Law Firm blog. Stay informed and up-to-date on defense strategies and legal precedents.
The recent ruling no. 16080 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the implications of the request for an oral hearing during criminal proceedings held in a chamber format during the Covid-19 pandemic, highlighting the absolute nullity in the absence of the defense attorney.
Let's analyze the ruling no. 16132 of 2024, which clarifies the requirements for the application of personal precautionary measures in relation to the risk of evidence tampering, providing an important indication on the investigative needs of the defendants.
Judgment No. 16131 of 2024 clarifies the conditions for the applicability of Article 585, paragraph 1-bis, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, highlighting the importance of the defendant's presence during the trial. Let's explore the details and legal implications.
Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation regarding the defense's opposition to the renewal of the trial proceedings and its implications for the nullity of the appellate judgment.
An analysis of ruling no. 17160 of 2024, which clarifies the procedures for the filing of appeals according to the emergency regulations provided by Italian law.
The ruling no. 14743 of 2024 by the Court of Appeal of Milan clarifies the methods of direct examination of the body of the crime, highlighting the absence of an obligation for a debate with the defense. Let’s explore the legal implications of this decision together.
Ruling No. 14657 of 2024 clarifies the importance of translation for non-Italian-speaking defendants in precautionary procedures, establishing that the absence of translation nullifies the measures adopted.
Judgment No. 16046 of 2024 of the Court of Cassation provides important insights on the principle of the immutability of the judge, clarifying the conditions under which a panel of judges may legitimately issue a ruling, even if composed differently from the one initially appointed.
Judgment No. 15865 of 2024 clarifies the need for a specific mandate for the appeal in the absence of the defendant, highlighting issues in state-funded legal representation.
Judgment No. 16514 of 2024 addresses the issue of the defendant's ability to consciously participate in the proceedings, highlighting the importance of expert testimony and procedural protection.