The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the requirements for the start of the deadline for filing an appeal to the Court of Cassation following the inadmissibility of the appeal, highlighting the importance of communicating the decision.
The ruling no. 15639 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the jurisdiction of the court regarding creditor claims in the rental field, excluding the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace even for amounts less than five thousand euros.
Order No. 20129 of 2024 establishes the declarative obligation for vehicle lessees and sublessees, clarifying responsibilities regarding road traffic and penalties. Let's explore the meaning and implications of this decision.
Order No. 18966 of 2024 of the Court of Cassation addresses the important issue of the consolidation of appeals in the event of concurrent pendency, with significant implications for civil procedural law.
The order of the Court of Naples clarifies the prerequisites for the allocation of compensation to the judicial administrator of seized assets, highlighting the importance of compliance with the judge's directives and legality.
We analyze ruling no. 17956 of 2024, which clarifies the burden of proof regarding the compatibility between the right of use on a parking area and the easement of passage. A fundamental ruling for the management of property rights.
Order No. 16760 of 2024 clarifies the responsibility for maintenance costs in condominiums, emphasizing the role of the exclusive owner compared to the condominium assembly.
Order No. 19892 of 2024 provides important clarifications on off-budget municipal expenses and the role of administrators, highlighting the prerequisites for the emergence of mandatory relationships between private individuals and local authorities.
Order No. 15906 of 2024 clarifies the right of lateral view for apartment owners in condominiums, emphasizing the importance of light and air for the livability of living spaces.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies that the appeal against a bankruptcy judgment is not exempt from the unified contribution, resulting in a doubling in case of rejection. Let's analyze the legal and practical implications of this decision.