Let's analyze ruling no. 526 of the Court of Cassation from 2025, which offers important insights on the liability of directors in cases of tax evasion and the application of thresholds for punishment.
The ruling no. 30092 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation provides significant insights into the classification of precautionary measures in cases of tax violations. An in-depth analysis of liability and thresholds of punishability.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation analyzes the complexity of specific intent in the crime of failure to declare IRES, highlighting the importance of proof of evasive intent and the principle of beyond a reasonable doubt.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the criteria for territorial jurisdiction in cases of failure to pay VAT, highlighting the jurisprudential conflict and the importance of the place of assessment.
The ruling of the Supreme Court of Cassation in 2024 provides significant insights into the qualification of tax offenses and the principle of ne bis in idem, delving into issues related to undue compensation and precautionary measures.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation on February 14, 2024, provides important insights into the application of criminal laws regarding bankruptcy and tax violations. It analyzes the responsibilities of directors and the peculiarities of tax offenses in relation to bankruptcy.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the responsibilities of directors in the case of improper offsetting of tax credits, highlighting the role of eventual intent and the need for adequate checks.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation highlights the issues related to the determination of penalties and confiscation in tax offenses, referencing fundamental norms and legal principles vital for the protection of tax legality.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation addresses the issue of preventive seizure in cases of tax fraud, clarifying the boundaries between legitimacy and fraudulent acts. Let’s examine the key points and legal implications.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides significant insights into the issue of proportionality of sanctions in tax matters, exploring the dynamics between criminal and administrative sanctions and the principle of ne bis in idem.