The recent ruling by the Court of Cassation, No. 24732 of 2024, provides significant insights regarding support administration, a topic of increasing relevance in civil law. The judgment addressed a case in which the appointment of a support administrator generated family conflicts, raising crucial questions related to the procedural capacity of the beneficiary and the legitimacy of legal representation.
In the case at hand, A.A., the beneficiary of the support administration, had chosen his wife as a potential administrator, but the Court of Appeal appointed a lawyer, B.B., due to family conflicts. This decision raised the issue of the legitimacy and necessity of such an appointment, given that the beneficiary had clearly expressed his preference. This aspect is fundamental, as Italian law (Art. 408 c.c.) establishes that the will of the beneficiary must be respected.
The will of the beneficiary must, as far as possible, be respected, especially when expressed in the choice of the administrator.
The Court reiterated a fundamental principle: even if a support administrator is appointed, the beneficiary retains the capacity to act in court. The judgment emphasizes that support administration should be viewed as a personalized measure that takes into account the needs and context of the individual, avoiding standardized approaches. This approach aligns with the principles of protecting fundamental rights, as established in the Italian Constitution (Arts. 24 and 111).
Another relevant aspect that emerged from the judgment concerns the procedure for appointing the administrator. The Court found that the technical consultancy, which formed the basis of the decision to open the administration, was flawed due to the lack of participation of the beneficiary's lawyer. The presence of legal counsel is indeed a guaranteed right that cannot be denied. The Court therefore annulled the provision, highlighting the importance of adversarial proceedings and the active participation of the beneficiary and their counsel.
In conclusion, judgment No. 24732 of 2024 represents an important step forward in protecting the rights of beneficiaries of support administration. It reaffirms the individual's right to actively participate in the process concerning them, emphasizing the need for a careful and personalized assessment of their needs. This approach not only respects the dignity of the person but also ensures that protective measures do not become a means of unjustified limitation of individual freedom.
We constantly follow regulatory and jurisprudential developments, offering updated analyses and innovative solutions. We share legal developments to foster a more informed legal culture.
abduction of minors acceptance acceptance of inheritance accumulation of claims action for reduction adjustments adoptability adoption adult children adults adversarial proceeding agricultural contract alimony allocation of the marital home allowance review ascendants autonomy Bergamo best interest of the child best interests of the child biological truth biparentality burden of proof cancellation capacity to understand case law Cassation Cassation ruling change of residence charge child abduction child custody child hearing child protection Child Rights child support child's best interest child's hearing children's needs children's rights children's welfare children’s rights civil law civil liability civil union co-ownership co-parenting cohabitation cohabitation more uxorio collation compensatory liability consensual separation consent Constitutional Court court Court of Appeal Court of Brescia Court of Cassation Court of Crotone Court of Justice of the EU Court of Verona creditor protection creditors crime criminal law custody custody of minors custody rights damages compensation defense rights divorce divorce alimony divorce allowance divorce settlement domestic violence donation donations dual parenthood dual parenting economic disparity economic equity economic responsibility economic self-sufficiency emotional bonds emotional stability employability equity European Court of Justice European protection order evasion evidence exclusive custody extraordinary expenses family family conflict family conflicts family law family obligations family relationships family responsibilities family responsibility fault filial status filiation financial contribution forced heirs foreign minors foster care fragility freedom of choice gender dysphoria genetic testing grandparents guardianship habitual residence Hague Hague Convention hearing of the minor heirs holographic will incapacity incidental appeal income disparity indirect donations individual freedom ineffectiveness infidelity ingratitude inheritance inheritance division inheritance law inheritances interest of the minor international abduction international abduction of minors international custody international law inventory benefit Istanbul Convention Italian jurisprudence Italian justice joinder joinder of parties joint custody judgment judgment 34950/2022 judgments jurisdiction Jurisprudence law 184/1983 law 898/1970 legal aid legal community legal guardianship legitimaries legitimate legitimate share legitimization liability listening to the minor maintenance maintenance allowance maintenance obligation marital community marital home marital responsibility marital separation marriage mediation mild adoption minor abduction minor children minor hearing minor rights minor's opinion minors minors transfer minors' rights mistreatment moral violence mortgage mortgage registration mother's standing natural incapacity non-binary identity non-compliance non-pecuniary damage non-performance notification nullity nullity of will order parental authority parental capacity parental conflict parental consent parental inadequacy parental obligations parental responsibilities parental responsibility parental rights parenting agreement passive standing paternity paternity denial placement of minors protection of minors protection of minors' rights psychological health real estate transfer reconciliation reduction reduction of donations Regulation 2201/2003 reimbursement of expenses religious education repatriation responsibility revocability revocation revocation of spousal support right of defense right of reduction right to be heard right to defense rights of ascendants rights of the beneficiary risk of default ruling ruling 1234/2023 ruling 12345 ruling 16462 ruling 16691/2024 ruling 16703/2024 ruling 16716/2024 ruling 17191/2011 ruling 19069/2024 ruling 2023 ruling 2024 ruling 24369 ruling 2536/2024 ruling 32354/2024 ruling Cassation 2017 ruling Cassation 8229/2023 ruling no. 6433 ruling of the Court of Cassation rulings school self-determination self-responsibility sentence 8980 separation separation agreement separation charge severance pay sex reassignment shared custody shared parenting side agreements simulation social services special curator spousal duties spousal support spouses' rights stalking standard of living standing state of abandonment subsidiary liability succession successions support administration Supreme Court Supreme Court 2024 Supreme Court ruling surrogacy suspensive condition Swiss law technical consultancy territorial jurisdiction testamentary succession testamentary will testator's intention testimony transfer transfer of minors Turin ruling Ukraine unlawful detention violation violation of family assistance violence visitation visitation rights welfare of minors will will of the beneficiary