Divorce Alimony and Standing: Commentary on Cass. civ., Sez. I, Ord. n. 30179 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation, n. 30179 of 2024, addresses a crucial issue regarding divorce alimony and the mother's standing to request such support for the maintenance of her adult daughters. The Court examined the case of A.A. against B.B., highlighting the importance of cohabitation and the economic condition of the young women.

The Context of the Ruling

The controversy originated from a decree of the Court of Appeal of Naples, which had granted B.B.'s request to stop paying the alimony of 5,000 euros, arguing that the daughters were now adults and no longer lived with their mother. The Court of Cassation had to assess whether the lack of cohabitation was sufficient to exclude the mother's standing to receive the support.

The Court clarified that the mother's standing to request maintenance alimony does not depend solely on cohabitation but also on her ability to meet the needs of her daughters.

Legal Principles Involved

The ruling reiterated some fundamental principles of family law, particularly:

  • The maintenance of adult children is an obligation that exists until they achieve economic independence.
  • Cohabitation is not the only determining factor for standing to receive alimony; it is also necessary to consider the parent's role in meeting the child's needs.
  • Changes in economic conditions must be justified by factual developments and respect the principle of adversarial proceedings.

The Court then stated that the daughters' residence in Milan, although not temporary, did not exclude the mother's standing, as long as she continued to be the economic reference point for the young women.

Conclusions

The ruling of the Court of Cassation provides valuable insights for cases of separation and divorce, emphasizing that the assessment of standing to receive maintenance alimony must consider not only cohabitation but also the economic and relational context. It will be interesting to observe how this ruling influences future decisions in family matters.

Related Articles