The recent ordinance of the Supreme Court (no. 6802 of March 7, 2023) offers significant insights into the theme of parental responsibility and the religious education of minors. The ruling addresses an emblematic case concerning the choice to enroll a minor in religious education in public school, highlighting the delicacy of educational decisions in complex family contexts. By examining the case, it is possible to understand not only the legal positions of the parents but also the role of the judge in ensuring the best interests of the minor.
In the case at hand, the Court of Appeal of Venice had established that the choice regarding attendance at religious education belonged to the mother, particularly considering the family context and the education already provided to the older sister. However, the father, A.A., appealed, claiming a violation of religious rights and educational freedom. The Supreme Court then had to examine whether the decision of the Court of Appeal was in line with the principles of family law, particularly those enshrined in the Civil Code and international conventions.
The judge must take measures solely in the interest of the minor, avoiding substituting the parents in educational choices.
According to Article 316 of the Civil Code, parents must exercise parental responsibility by mutual agreement. In case of disagreement on matters of particular importance, the judge must intervene. The Supreme Court emphasized that choices regarding religion are not subject to review, but this does not exclude that, in the event of conflict, the judge must assess the potential impact of the choices on minors. Principles of international law, such as the New York Convention on the Rights of the Child, reiterate the importance of respecting religious beliefs and educational freedom, but always with respect to the best interests of the minor.
The ruling reaffirms that, in the event of conflict between parents, the decision must be guided by the principle of the minor's interest. In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the father's appeal, stating that the issue of religious education could not be resolved without an adequate assessment of the needs and inclinations of the minor. Furthermore, the importance of listening to the minor herself, even if very young, was highlighted in order to understand her educational and spiritual needs.
The ruling of the Supreme Court represents an important guide for resolving family disputes regarding the religious education of minors. It underscores the fundamental role of the judge in ensuring that decisions are always oriented toward the best interests of the minor, evaluating the specific circumstances of each case. In an increasingly complex social context, it is essential that the principles of religious freedom and parental responsibility are carefully balanced to ensure the healthy and serene growth of the minors involved.
We constantly follow regulatory and jurisprudential developments, offering updated analyses and innovative solutions. We share legal developments to foster a more informed legal culture.
abduction of minors acceptance acceptance of inheritance accumulation of claims action for reduction adjustments adoptability adoption adult children adults adversarial proceeding agricultural contract alimony allocation of the marital home allowance review ascendants autonomy Bergamo best interest of the child best interests of the child biological truth biparentality burden of proof cancellation capacity to understand case law Cassation Cassation ruling change of residence charge child abduction child custody child hearing child protection Child Rights child support child's best interest child's hearing children's needs children's rights children's welfare children’s rights civil law civil liability civil union co-ownership co-parenting cohabitation cohabitation more uxorio collation compensatory liability consensual separation consent Constitutional Court court Court of Appeal Court of Brescia Court of Cassation Court of Crotone Court of Justice of the EU Court of Verona creditor protection creditors crime criminal law custody custody of minors custody rights damages compensation defense rights divorce divorce alimony divorce allowance divorce settlement domestic violence donation donations dual parenthood dual parenting economic disparity economic equity economic responsibility economic self-sufficiency emotional bonds emotional stability employability equity European Court of Justice European protection order evasion evidence exclusive custody extraordinary expenses family family conflict family conflicts family law family obligations family relationships family responsibilities family responsibility fault filial status filiation financial contribution forced heirs foreign minors foster care fragility freedom of choice gender dysphoria genetic testing grandparents guardianship habitual residence Hague Hague Convention hearing of the minor heirs holographic will incapacity incidental appeal income disparity indirect donations individual freedom ineffectiveness infidelity ingratitude inheritance inheritance division inheritance law inheritances interest of the minor international abduction international abduction of minors international custody international law inventory benefit Istanbul Convention Italian jurisprudence Italian justice joinder joinder of parties joint custody judgment judgment 34950/2022 judgments jurisdiction Jurisprudence law 184/1983 law 898/1970 legal aid legal community legal guardianship legitimaries legitimate legitimate share legitimization liability listening to the minor maintenance maintenance allowance maintenance obligation marital community marital home marital responsibility marital separation marriage mediation mild adoption minor abduction minor children minor hearing minor rights minor's opinion minors minors transfer minors' rights mistreatment moral violence mortgage mortgage registration mother's standing natural incapacity non-binary identity non-compliance non-pecuniary damage non-performance notification nullity nullity of will order parental authority parental capacity parental conflict parental consent parental inadequacy parental obligations parental responsibilities parental responsibility parental rights parenting agreement passive standing paternity paternity denial placement of minors protection of minors protection of minors' rights psychological health real estate transfer reconciliation reduction reduction of donations Regulation 2201/2003 reimbursement of expenses religious education repatriation responsibility revocability revocation revocation of spousal support right of defense right of reduction right to be heard right to defense rights of ascendants rights of the beneficiary risk of default ruling ruling 1234/2023 ruling 12345 ruling 16462 ruling 16691/2024 ruling 16703/2024 ruling 16716/2024 ruling 17191/2011 ruling 19069/2024 ruling 2023 ruling 2024 ruling 24369 ruling 2536/2024 ruling 32354/2024 ruling Cassation 2017 ruling Cassation 8229/2023 ruling no. 6433 ruling of the Court of Cassation rulings school self-determination self-responsibility sentence 8980 separation separation agreement separation charge severance pay sex reassignment shared custody shared parenting side agreements simulation social services special curator spousal duties spousal support spouses' rights stalking standard of living standing state of abandonment subsidiary liability succession successions support administration Supreme Court Supreme Court 2024 Supreme Court ruling surrogacy suspensive condition Swiss law technical consultancy territorial jurisdiction testamentary succession testamentary will testator's intention testimony transfer transfer of minors Turin ruling Ukraine unlawful detention violation violation of family assistance violence visitation visitation rights welfare of minors will will of the beneficiary