Parental Responsibility and Religious Education: Analysis of the Recent Ruling by the Supreme Court

The recent ordinance of the Supreme Court (no. 6802 of March 7, 2023) offers significant insights into the theme of parental responsibility and the religious education of minors. The ruling addresses an emblematic case concerning the choice to enroll a minor in religious education in public school, highlighting the delicacy of educational decisions in complex family contexts. By examining the case, it is possible to understand not only the legal positions of the parents but also the role of the judge in ensuring the best interests of the minor.

The Context of the Decision

In the case at hand, the Court of Appeal of Venice had established that the choice regarding attendance at religious education belonged to the mother, particularly considering the family context and the education already provided to the older sister. However, the father, A.A., appealed, claiming a violation of religious rights and educational freedom. The Supreme Court then had to examine whether the decision of the Court of Appeal was in line with the principles of family law, particularly those enshrined in the Civil Code and international conventions.

Legal Principles Involved

The judge must take measures solely in the interest of the minor, avoiding substituting the parents in educational choices.

According to Article 316 of the Civil Code, parents must exercise parental responsibility by mutual agreement. In case of disagreement on matters of particular importance, the judge must intervene. The Supreme Court emphasized that choices regarding religion are not subject to review, but this does not exclude that, in the event of conflict, the judge must assess the potential impact of the choices on minors. Principles of international law, such as the New York Convention on the Rights of the Child, reiterate the importance of respecting religious beliefs and educational freedom, but always with respect to the best interests of the minor.

The Implications of the Ruling

The ruling reaffirms that, in the event of conflict between parents, the decision must be guided by the principle of the minor's interest. In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the father's appeal, stating that the issue of religious education could not be resolved without an adequate assessment of the needs and inclinations of the minor. Furthermore, the importance of listening to the minor herself, even if very young, was highlighted in order to understand her educational and spiritual needs.

  • Respect for the parents' religious freedom
  • Assessment of the best interests of the minor
  • Need to listen to the minor in case of conflict

Conclusions

The ruling of the Supreme Court represents an important guide for resolving family disputes regarding the religious education of minors. It underscores the fundamental role of the judge in ensuring that decisions are always oriented toward the best interests of the minor, evaluating the specific circumstances of each case. In an increasingly complex social context, it is essential that the principles of religious freedom and parental responsibility are carefully balanced to ensure the healthy and serene growth of the minors involved.

Bianucci Law Firm