The ruling no. 20228 of June 23, 2022, of the Supreme Court represents an important decision regarding divorce and alimony. Analyzing the case of B.A. and D.B., the Court provided significant clarifications regarding the criteria for determining alimony, the causality in the separation, and the economic conditions of the spouses.
The Court of Palermo had initially established an alimony of €2,500.00 per month in favor of D.B. and a contribution of €4,000.00 for the maintenance of the daughters. The Court of Appeal, confirming the decision, excluded the fault for the separation from D.B., believing that the marital crisis was already in progress before her departure from the marital home.
The Court of Appeal considered the wife's departure as a consequence rather than the cause of the marital crisis, based on circumstantial evidence and testimonies.
The appellant contested the Court of Appeal's decision on three main grounds:
The Supreme Court found the grounds unfounded, confirming that the marital crisis predated the abandonment and that the quantification of alimony was based on concrete and measurable elements, such as the standard of living during the marriage.
This ruling highlights the importance of a thorough analysis of economic conditions and relational dynamics in the context of separation and divorce. The Supreme Court reiterated that alimony must reflect not only the economic needs of the less affluent spouse but also the standard of living enjoyed during the marriage, always with careful consideration of the actual earning capacities of the parties involved.
We constantly follow regulatory and jurisprudential developments, offering updated analyses and innovative solutions. We share legal developments to foster a more informed legal culture.
accumulation of claims alimony allocation of the marital home ascendants Bergamo best interest of the child best interests of the child biological truth burden of proof cancellation case law Cassation charge child custody child hearing child protection child support child's best interest child's hearing children's rights children's welfare children’s rights civil law civil liability co-parenting cohabitation consensual separation consent court Court of Appeal Court of Cassation Court of Crotone Court of Verona criminal law custody damages compensation divorce divorce alimony divorce allowance divorce settlement domestic violence donation dual parenthood economic responsibility economic self-sufficiency evidence exclusive custody extraordinary expenses family conflict family conflicts family law family obligations family relationships fault filiation foster care grandparents incidental appeal infidelity ingratitude interest of the minor Italian jurisprudence joinder joinder of parties joint custody judgment judgment 34950/2022 Jurisprudence maintenance maintenance allowance maintenance obligation marital home marital separation mediation minor children minors minors transfer minors' rights mistreatment moral violence mother's standing non-pecuniary damage order parental conflict parental obligations parental responsibility parenting agreement paternity paternity denial placement of minors religious education responsibility revocation revocation of spousal support rights of ascendants ruling ruling 1234/2023 ruling 16462 ruling 16691/2024 ruling 2023 ruling 2024 ruling 24369 ruling 2536/2024 ruling no. 6433 school sentence 8980 separation separation agreement separation charge severance pay shared custody shared parenting stalking standing subsidiary liability Supreme Court Supreme Court ruling surrogacy testimony transfer transfer of minors Turin ruling violation of family assistance visitation rights welfare of minors