The judgment No. 2417 of 2016 of the Court of Cassation fits into the context of disputes related to international child abduction, a topic of great legal and social significance. In this case, the Court had to decide whether to accept the request for the repatriation of a minor by her father, S.B., against the denial of the Juvenile Court of Naples. The Court's decision highlights the importance of considering not only the legitimacy of the transfer but also the psycho-physical well-being of the minor involved.
The case concerned a minor named S.A., whose mother, H.E.V., had brought her to Italy without the father's consent. During the proceedings, the Juvenile Court of Naples established the legitimacy of the abduction, emphasizing that a potential repatriation to Hungary would expose the child to serious risks to her psychological safety. According to the judges, the father’s family context presented dangerous elements, such as relationships with individuals involved in prostitution and a potentially harmful environment for the minor's development.
The Juvenile Court justified its ruling, noting that returning to the paternal living context would expose the minor to significant dangers for her psycho-physical development.
The appellant, S.B., contested the decision of the Court, arguing that insufficient evidence regarding the risks to the minor had been provided. However, the Court reiterated that the judge cannot ignore evidence of physical or psychological danger to the minor, as established by Article 13 of the Hague Convention. In this case, the Court confirmed the Juvenile Court's assessment, which was based on a series of evidences, including statements from Hungarian social authorities and testimonies confirming the unsuitability of the paternal context.
This judgment represents an important reminder of the need to protect minors in situations of international abduction. Legal decisions must take into account not only the formal legitimacy of transfers but also the living conditions awaiting minors in their countries of origin. The Court of Cassation demonstrated that the safety and well-being of the minor are absolute priorities, in accordance with Italian and European regulations regarding child protection.
In summary, judgment No. 2417 of 2016 reaffirms the importance of protecting minors in situations of international abduction. The Court of Cassation, in evaluating the case, confirmed that returning to a potentially dangerous family context cannot be justified without concrete evidence of safety for the minor. This decision will undoubtedly have a significant impact on future disputes in the field of family law and child protection.
We constantly follow regulatory and jurisprudential developments, offering updated analyses and innovative solutions. We share legal developments to foster a more informed legal culture.
abduction of minors acceptance acceptance of inheritance accumulation of claims action for reduction adjustments adoptability adoption adult children adults adversarial proceeding agricultural contract alimony allocation of the marital home allowance review ascendants autonomy Bergamo best interest of the child best interests of the child biological truth biparentality burden of proof cancellation capacity to understand case law Cassation Cassation ruling change of residence charge child abduction child custody child hearing child protection Child Rights child support child's best interest child's hearing children's needs children's rights children's welfare children’s rights civil law civil liability civil union co-ownership co-parenting cohabitation cohabitation more uxorio collation compensatory liability consensual separation consent Constitutional Court court Court of Appeal Court of Brescia Court of Cassation Court of Crotone Court of Justice of the EU Court of Verona creditor protection creditors crime criminal law custody custody of minors custody rights damages compensation defense rights divorce divorce alimony divorce allowance divorce settlement domestic violence donation donations dual parenthood dual parenting economic disparity economic equity economic responsibility economic self-sufficiency emotional bonds emotional stability employability equity European Court of Justice European protection order evasion evidence exclusive custody extraordinary expenses family family conflict family conflicts family law family obligations family relationships family responsibilities family responsibility fault filial status filiation financial contribution forced heirs foreign minors foster care fragility freedom of choice gender dysphoria genetic testing grandparents guardianship habitual residence Hague Hague Convention hearing of the minor heirs holographic will incapacity incidental appeal income disparity indirect donations individual freedom ineffectiveness infidelity ingratitude inheritance inheritance division inheritance law inheritances interest of the minor international abduction international abduction of minors international custody international law inventory benefit Istanbul Convention Italian jurisprudence Italian justice joinder joinder of parties joint custody judgment judgment 34950/2022 judgments jurisdiction Jurisprudence law 184/1983 law 898/1970 legal aid legal community legal guardianship legitimaries legitimate legitimate share legitimization liability listening to the minor maintenance maintenance allowance maintenance obligation marital community marital home marital responsibility marital separation marriage mediation mild adoption minor abduction minor children minor hearing minor rights minor's opinion minors minors transfer minors' rights mistreatment moral violence mortgage mortgage registration mother's standing natural incapacity non-binary identity non-compliance non-pecuniary damage non-performance notification nullity nullity of will order parental authority parental capacity parental conflict parental consent parental inadequacy parental obligations parental responsibilities parental responsibility parental rights parenting agreement passive standing paternity paternity denial placement of minors protection of minors protection of minors' rights psychological health real estate transfer reconciliation reduction reduction of donations Regulation 2201/2003 reimbursement of expenses religious education repatriation responsibility revocability revocation revocation of spousal support right of defense right of reduction right to be heard right to defense rights of ascendants rights of the beneficiary risk of default ruling ruling 1234/2023 ruling 12345 ruling 16462 ruling 16691/2024 ruling 16703/2024 ruling 16716/2024 ruling 17191/2011 ruling 19069/2024 ruling 2023 ruling 2024 ruling 24369 ruling 2536/2024 ruling 32354/2024 ruling Cassation 2017 ruling Cassation 8229/2023 ruling no. 6433 ruling of the Court of Cassation rulings school self-determination self-responsibility sentence 8980 separation separation agreement separation charge severance pay sex reassignment shared custody shared parenting side agreements simulation social services special curator spousal duties spousal support spouses' rights stalking standard of living standing state of abandonment subsidiary liability succession successions support administration Supreme Court Supreme Court 2024 Supreme Court ruling surrogacy suspensive condition Swiss law technical consultancy territorial jurisdiction testamentary succession testamentary will testator's intention testimony transfer transfer of minors Turin ruling Ukraine unlawful detention violation violation of family assistance violence visitation visitation rights welfare of minors will will of the beneficiary