The Supreme Court and Successions: Commentary on Judgment No. 28666/2024

Judgment No. 28666 of 2024 from the Supreme Court offers an important reflection on the dynamics related to the acceptance of inheritance and the division of assets in the event of succession. In particular, the case analyzed concerns two brothers, A.A. and B.B., engaged in a dispute for the dissolution of a hereditary community concerning a property. This decision provides relevant insights for understanding the legal implications of legitimate succession and the rights of heirs.

The Context of the Judgment

A.A. had initiated legal action to obtain the dissolution of the hereditary community, claiming to be the sole heir of his mother, who passed away in 2007. The central issue was whether B.B. had tacitly accepted the inheritance, which would have resulted in an equal division of the property. The Court of Appeal of Palermo, in partially reforming the first-instance judgment, recognized B.B. as an heir as well, establishing that both were co-owners of the property in equal shares of 1/2 each.

The issue of inheritance acceptance and its implication on heir status are central in the succession proceedings.

The Court's Main Considerations

  • The Court established that the actio interrogatoria, provided for by art. 481 of the Civil Code, is not aimed at resolving conflicts of rights, but at verifying the intention of acceptance by the heir.
  • It was clarified that the status of heir is not precluded by mere anticipation of a declaration of acceptance, but can also arise from acts of possession of inherited assets, as provided by art. 485 of the Civil Code.
  • The Court also highlighted that the division of abusive inherited assets must comply with building regulations and cannot disregard the regularity of the acts.

Conclusions

Judgment No. 28666/2024 from the Supreme Court fits into a line of jurisprudence of fundamental importance for inheritance law. It emphasizes that the status of heir can also be acquired through possession of assets, without the need for formal acceptance. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of building regularity in the context of the division of inherited assets. These principles represent a useful reference for legal practitioners and those managing similar situations.

Bianucci Law Firm