• via Alberto da Giussano, 26, 20145 Milano
  • +39 02 4003 1253
  • info@studiolegalebianucci.it
  • Criminal Lawyer, Family Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer

Child Custody and Parental Capacities: Analysis of Cass. civ., Section I, Order No. 27348/2022

In order No. 27348/2022, the Court of Cassation addressed a complex case of child custody in the context of separation between two spouses, S.F. and C.C. The decision highlighted the importance of evaluating parental capacities and the real interests of the minors, emphasizing how a parent's behavior can profoundly influence the judge's decisions.

The Case and the Decision of the Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal of Milan confirmed the exclusive custody of the two children to the mother, C.C., after finding the significant incapacity of the father, S.F., to properly manage parental functions. It was emphasized that the father's behavior had created a serious decision-making stalemate, jeopardizing the interests of the minors.

The judge's evaluation must always prioritize the moral and material interests of the children, ensuring their serene and harmonious development.

In particular, the Court emphasized that the father did not respond to the mother's communications, further complicating the daily management of the children. Despite the appellant's complaints, the Court of Cassation confirmed that the decisions of the trial judge could not be challenged as they were based on a careful assessment of the evidence.

The Arguments of the Court of Cassation

The Court of Cassation rejected the grounds for appeal put forward by S.F., highlighting that the choice of exclusive custody was not the result of a superficial judgment, but of a thorough analysis of the family situation. In particular, the judges reiterated that the interests of the minors must be the fundamental criterion for any decision regarding custody.

  • The judge must assess each parent's ability to provide a healthy and stimulating environment for the minors.
  • Decisions can deviate from the requests of the parties when necessary to protect the interests of the minors.
  • The inability to communicate between parents is a determining factor in the choice of custody.

Conclusions

The ruling of the Court of Cassation No. 27348/2022 offers important insights for understanding the jurisprudential orientation regarding child custody. It emphasizes that the interests of the minors must always prevail and that the decisions of the trial judge, based on concrete evidence and thorough analysis, are generally not subject to review in legitimacy proceedings. Parents facing similar situations must keep in mind that their ability to interact and cooperate is crucial for the well-being of their children and for the decisions that will be made by the judge.