The recent ruling from the Court of Cassation, No. 20034 of 2024, has raised important questions regarding alimony and the assignment of the marital home in cases of separation. In this article, we will analyze the key points of the ruling and its implications for spouses undergoing separation and divorce.
The case examined by the Court of Cassation involves A.A. and B.B., ex-spouses who had agreed to a consensual separation in 2014, with the attribution of a monthly alimony and the right to enjoy the marital home in favor of the wife. The issue intensified when A.A. requested the cessation of the civil effects of the marriage without further obligations, while B.B. requested a significantly higher alimony. The Court of Appeal of Venice initially accepted B.B.'s requests, but A.A. appealed the decision to the Cassation.
In the context of consensual separation, the agreements of the spouses have an essential content, which has a concrete cause in the separation, containing the pacts aimed at fulfilling the duties of marital solidarity.
The Court of Cassation emphasized that the separation agreement may include essential pacts and accessory pacts. Essential pacts are those that directly concern the separation and may be modified by the judge during divorce proceedings. However, accessory pacts, such as the attribution of the marital home, may be considered autonomous and not subject to modification by the divorce judge.
The ruling of the Cassation No. 20034 of 2024 provides significant insights for understanding the legal dynamics related to divorce and alimony. It reaffirms the importance of distinguishing between essential and accessory pacts in separation agreements, emphasizing the need for careful evaluation of the personal and financial circumstances of each spouse. Lawyers and professionals in the field must take these distinctions into account to ensure proper management of divorce proceedings.