Order No. 20129 of 2024 establishes the declarative obligation for vehicle lessees and sublessees, clarifying responsibilities regarding road traffic and penalties. Let's explore the meaning and implications of this decision.
An in-depth analysis of the ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the distinction between a claim for damages and compensation in the event of contractual non-performance, with reference to Article 1381 of the Civil Code.
Let's analyze the important Order No. 20480 of 2024, which highlights the judge's responsibility in ensuring compliance with informational obligations in the procedure for transferring international protection applicants.
Analysis of ruling no. 20087/2024 regarding the informational obligations in the context of international protection and the role of the Dublin Unit. Discover how the failure to deliver the informational booklet can affect the defense rights of foreigners.
Let's analyze ruling no. 15695 of 2024, which clarifies the requirements for the validity of the conventional purpose loan, highlighting the differences compared to the traditional loan and the legal implications for the parties involved.
The ruling no. 15673 of 2024 clarifies the exclusive jurisdiction of the administrative judge in cases of non-compliance with obligations arising from supplementary agreements between Regions and basin authorities, a topic of significant importance for administrative law.
The ruling No. 25379 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the possibility of cumulating the obligation to present oneself to the judicial police and the DASPO with the obligation to sign, highlighting the autonomy of these measures in the context of sporting events.
Ruling No. 25368 of 2023 clarifies the implications of violating custody obligations in the case of the seizure of registered movable assets, highlighting the deadline for filing a complaint and the responsibilities of the custodian.
Analysis of ruling no. 24487 of 2023, which clarifies how silence on subsequent events may constitute a deceptive conduct in fraud cases, with particular reference to monetary obligations.
The recent ruling no. 51452 of 2023 clarifies the duties of a custodian of goods in relation to liability for negligence, highlighting how even those who are not owners can be held responsible for harmful events.