Judges in Legal Practice: Insights and Analysis

Discover a collection of articles focusing on judges in legal practice. Gain insights, analysis, and case studies to stay informed on the latest jurisprudence trends.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 575 of 2025: Territorial Jurisdiction and Responsibility of Judges

The recent Order No. 575 of 2025 clarifies the rules of territorial jurisdiction in cases of civil liability of magistrates, highlighting the distinction between intentional and negligent behaviors, and the related legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 525 of 2025: The Power of the Judge and Civil Evidence

Analysis of the recent ruling by the Court of Cassation regarding the judge's power to request information from the public administration, focusing on liability for damages from blood transfusions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 1653 of 2025: The Principle of 'Favor Rei' in the Disciplinary Responsibility of Judges.

Let’s explore the recent ruling no. 1653 of 2025, which clarifies the applicability of the principle of 'favor rei' in disciplinary matters for judges, highlighting its implications and limits.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 1663 of 2024: Referral to the Civil Judge in Case of Dispute over Ownership.

Judgment no. 1663 of 2024 clarifies the procedures for referral to the civil court in case of disputes over the ownership of seized assets. Let’s explore the implications of this decision and its impact on criminal procedural law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 1270 of 2024: The Rationale of the Judgment and the Powers of the Court of Appeal.

Let's explore the recent ruling no. 1270 of the Court of Appeal of Cagliari, which clarifies the methods of supplementing the reasoning by the appellate judge and the implications for the defendant.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 2974 of 2025: Execution and Jurisdiction of the Judge

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Rome offers significant insights into the scope of measures that can be adopted by the president of the panel, clarifying the limits and consequences of the delegation of competence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Incompatibility of the Judge in Asset Prevention Measures: Commentary on Judgment No. 44504 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Florence raises important constitutional legitimacy issues regarding the incompatibility of the judge in the context of asset prevention measures, highlighting the need for a proper application of the norms and fundamental rights.

Bianucci Law Firm
Functional jurisdiction and waiver of perpetuatio iurisdictionis: analysis of ruling no. 44814 of 2024.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation No. 44814 of 2024 addresses the issue of jurisdiction in proceedings concerning magistrates, highlighting the exception to the principle of perpetuatio iurisdictionis and the importance of the emerging situation during the trial.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 26805 of 2024: Nullity and Jurisdiction of Honorary Justices of the Peace in the Court of Review.

Analysis of ruling no. 26805 of 2024 on the nullity of orders issued by honorary justices of the peace in the context of the review court, highlighting the legal and regulatory implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Order No. 19777 of 17/07/2024: Clarifications on the Commencement of Terms in Forced Execution.

Order no. 19777 of July 17, 2024 provides important clarifications on the commencement of deadlines for executive opposition, highlighting the role of the judge and the methods of communication of documents.