Discover a collection of articles focusing on judges in legal practice. Gain insights, analysis, and case studies to stay informed on the latest jurisprudence trends.
The recent Order No. 575 of 2025 clarifies the rules of territorial jurisdiction in cases of civil liability of magistrates, highlighting the distinction between intentional and negligent behaviors, and the related legal implications.
Analysis of the recent ruling by the Court of Cassation regarding the judge's power to request information from the public administration, focusing on liability for damages from blood transfusions.
Let’s explore the recent ruling no. 1653 of 2025, which clarifies the applicability of the principle of 'favor rei' in disciplinary matters for judges, highlighting its implications and limits.
Judgment no. 1663 of 2024 clarifies the procedures for referral to the civil court in case of disputes over the ownership of seized assets. Let’s explore the implications of this decision and its impact on criminal procedural law.
Let's explore the recent ruling no. 1270 of the Court of Appeal of Cagliari, which clarifies the methods of supplementing the reasoning by the appellate judge and the implications for the defendant.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Rome offers significant insights into the scope of measures that can be adopted by the president of the panel, clarifying the limits and consequences of the delegation of competence.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Florence raises important constitutional legitimacy issues regarding the incompatibility of the judge in the context of asset prevention measures, highlighting the need for a proper application of the norms and fundamental rights.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation No. 44814 of 2024 addresses the issue of jurisdiction in proceedings concerning magistrates, highlighting the exception to the principle of perpetuatio iurisdictionis and the importance of the emerging situation during the trial.
Analysis of ruling no. 26805 of 2024 on the nullity of orders issued by honorary justices of the peace in the context of the review court, highlighting the legal and regulatory implications.
Order no. 19777 of July 17, 2024 provides important clarifications on the commencement of deadlines for executive opposition, highlighting the role of the judge and the methods of communication of documents.