Discover a collection of articles focusing on judges in legal practice. Gain insights, analysis, and case studies to stay informed on the latest jurisprudence trends.
Judgment no. 16668 of 2024 clarifies the boundaries of incompatibility for lawyers who also serve as honorary judges. Discover the legal and regulatory implications of this decision.
The ruling of the Court of Appeal of Turin clarifies the effectiveness of powers of attorney in the context of guardianship administration, highlighting the limitations imposed by the guardianship judge.
Let's analyze ruling no. 26336 of 2023, which clarifies the exclusive jurisdiction of the execution judge regarding the prescription of the sentence, excluding the supervising magistrate. Let's discover the meaning of this important legal decision.
Judgment no. 26548 of 2023 clarifies important aspects regarding the nullity of notification in immediate proceedings, establishing that the renewal of compliance falls to the trial judge. Let us explore the legal and practical implications of this decision together.
We analyze ruling no. 27727 of 2023, which clarifies the implications of surpassing the age of sixty-five by lay judges and their jurisdictional capacity during the trial.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Lecce clarifies the dynamics of the change in the judging panel and the principle of the immutability of the judge in relation to the statute of limitations for crimes.
Judgment No. 49347 of 2023 addresses the issue of the deadline for appealing the judgment of an absent defendant, analyzing the rights to renew evidence and the powers of the appellate judge. Let’s explore together the legal and practical implications of this decision.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Catanzaro clarifies the effects of acts performed by a recused judge, highlighting the importance of the declaration of effectiveness for procedural validity.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Taranto clarifies the powers of the judge in evaluating court-appointed technical consultancies, highlighting the necessity of making a choice and the impossibility of merely acknowledging the conflict between the conclusions.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides significant insights regarding the recusal of a judge in criminal proceedings involving criminal associations composed of a few members. Let us analyze the legal principles at stake.