Judges in Legal Practice: Insights and Analysis

Discover a collection of articles focusing on judges in legal practice. Gain insights, analysis, and case studies to stay informed on the latest jurisprudence trends.

Bianucci Law Firm
Incompatibility of the Lawyer: Analysis of Ruling No. 16668 of 2024

Judgment no. 16668 of 2024 clarifies the boundaries of incompatibility for lawyers who also serve as honorary judges. Discover the legal and regulatory implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 16052 of 2024: Representation in Support Administration.

The ruling of the Court of Appeal of Turin clarifies the effectiveness of powers of attorney in the context of guardianship administration, highlighting the limitations imposed by the guardianship judge.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 26336 of 2023: The jurisdiction of the execution judge in the prescription of the sentence.

Let's analyze ruling no. 26336 of 2023, which clarifies the exclusive jurisdiction of the execution judge regarding the prescription of the sentence, excluding the supervising magistrate. Let's discover the meaning of this important legal decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Nullity of Notification and Jurisdiction of the Judge in Immediate Proceedings: Analysis of Judgment No. 26548 of 2023.

Judgment no. 26548 of 2023 clarifies important aspects regarding the nullity of notification in immediate proceedings, establishing that the renewal of compliance falls to the trial judge. Let us explore the legal and practical implications of this decision together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 27727 of 2023: Lay Judges and Age Limits in Criminal Proceedings

We analyze ruling no. 27727 of 2023, which clarifies the implications of surpassing the age of sixty-five by lay judges and their jurisdictional capacity during the trial.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 51433 of 2023: Change of Judge and Prescription.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Lecce clarifies the dynamics of the change in the judging panel and the principle of the immutability of the judge in relation to the statute of limitations for crimes.

Bianucci Law Firm
The right of appeal and the renewal of evidence: analysis of ruling no. 49347 of 2023.

Judgment No. 49347 of 2023 addresses the issue of the deadline for appealing the judgment of an absent defendant, analyzing the rights to renew evidence and the powers of the appellate judge. Let’s explore together the legal and practical implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Effects of a Judge's Abstention: Analysis of Judgment No. 16481 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Catanzaro clarifies the effects of acts performed by a recused judge, highlighting the importance of the declaration of effectiveness for procedural validity.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 11091 of 2024: The Evaluation of the Conclusions of a Court-Appointed Technical Expert.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Taranto clarifies the powers of the judge in evaluating court-appointed technical consultancies, highlighting the necessity of making a choice and the impossibility of merely acknowledging the conflict between the conclusions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 15705 of 2023: Recusal of the Judge in Cases of Criminal Conspiracy

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides significant insights regarding the recusal of a judge in criminal proceedings involving criminal associations composed of a few members. Let us analyze the legal principles at stake.