The Court of Cassation, with ruling no. 5148 of 2011, addresses the complexity of price revision in public contracts, emphasizing the importance of reasoning in legal decisions and the correct application of ministerial tables.
Let's analyze the ruling no. 27090 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the boundaries of the crime of embezzlement in relation to contracts with private companies.
Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 20052 of 2024 from the Court of Cassation regarding the possibility of tacit revocation of the written form in contracts. Let's discover what it means for the parties involved and what the legal implications are.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the conditions for the integration of urban planning certification in the case of the sale of land that has become non-buildable. Discover how this ruling affects real estate transactions.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies important aspects regarding the prohibition of usury in banking contracts, establishing that the prohibition is applicable regardless of the resolution of the CICR. Let’s explore the meaning of this important decision.
Order No. 18230 of 2024 clarifies the requirement of written form in bank contracts, excluding the need for document delivery. Let’s explore the legal implications of this decision together.
Let's explore the importance of the recent ruling no. 16604 of 2024 regarding banking contracts, with a particular focus on the determination of interest in the absence of agreements between the parties.
Order no. 16456 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the methods for indicating extra-legal interests in banking contracts, establishing that mere numerical indication is not necessary, but referring to objective criteria is sufficient.
The recent ruling no. 15383 of 2024 clarifies the boundaries of ordinary jurisdiction in the event of the revocation of a public contract award, emphasizing the need to uphold the principles of fairness and good faith.
Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the conditions for the configuration of fraud in instant execution contracts, highlighting the importance of tricks and deceit during the contract conclusion phase.