Explore our collection of articles and resources on the burden of proof in legal cases. Learn about the importance of evidence and how it impacts court proceedings.
Order No. 17253 of 2024 clarifies the relevance of the burden of proof distribution in the claim for damages caused by wildlife, distinguishing between the application of Articles 2043 and 2052 of the Civil Code.
The ruling no. 19849 of 2024 from the Court of Cassation clarifies the methods of compensation for unlawful occupation of a property, establishing the burden of proof on the occupant. Let’s explore the details and legal implications of this decision.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the conditions of liability for the builder and the seller, highlighting the power of control and the legal implications in the case of construction defects. Let’s explore the details of this important ruling.
We analyze ruling no. 17956 of 2024, which clarifies the burden of proof regarding the compatibility between the right of use on a parking area and the easement of passage. A fundamental ruling for the management of property rights.
Judgment no. 10310 of 2024 clarifies the burden of proof on the taxpayer in the case of synthetic assessment, highlighting the importance of documentary evidence and symptomatic circumstances.
Discover how the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies workers' rights regarding paid breaks and compensatory rest, establishing specific burdens of proof for employees of private security institutions.
In this analysis, we delve into ruling no. 10479 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation regarding the action for accounting against the mandatary, clarifying the evidentiary duties incumbent on the latter and the importance of good administration.
The order of the Court of Cassation of April 10, 2024 clarifies the principles regarding the burden of proof in the action for negative credit verification, highlighting responsibilities and consequences for the creditor.
An important ruling by the Court of Cassation clarifies the burden of proof in the case of subsequent assignments of receivables. Let’s explore the details and legal implications of this decision.
In this ruling, the Court clarifies the burden of proof in boundary disputes, highlighting the responsibilities of both parties and the role of the judge in evaluating the evidential elements.