Analysis of ruling no. 28009 of 2024 concerning bankruptcy offenses and the recognition of aggravating circumstances related to financial damage, with a focus on the evaluation criteria established by law.
Let’s analyze the recent order no. 21397 of July 30, 2024, which clarifies the limits of application of administrative sanctions in the context of financial intermediation, highlighting the importance of substantive law and its impact on violations that occurred prior to the entry into force of the new provisions.
Judgment No. 18003 of 2024 clarifies the standing of individual condominium owners in the event of a reclamation action under Article 103 of the Bankruptcy Law and the consequences for opposition to the passive state.
Let's analyze the important ruling No. 17879 of 2024, which clarifies the methods for appealing professional fees in the context of bankruptcy and legal aid, highlighting the responsibilities of the appointed judge.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Bari clarifies the importance of including disputed claims in the classes of the preventive agreement, ensuring transparency and fairness in the procedure.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies important aspects regarding the prohibition of usury in banking contracts, establishing that the prohibition is applicable regardless of the resolution of the CICR. Let’s explore the meaning of this important decision.
This ruling clarifies the boundaries of the liability of banking intermediaries in the case of transfers executed with an incorrect IBAN, highlighting the importance of proper use of this code to avoid payment mishaps.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the dynamics related to the payment of others' debts and the presumptions of gratuity, shedding light on the role of economic interest and legal compensation.
The ruling no. 20862 of 2024 provides important clarifications on the appeal procedure for partial distributions in compulsory administrative liquidation, highlighting the applicable methods and relevant legal references.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the requirements for the independence of the expert in the preventive agreement, highlighting the legal and practical implications for professionals in the field.