Welcome to a curated selection of legal resources focusing on security in jurisprudence. Dive into articles, cases, and analysis to deepen your understanding of this important legal topic.
The recent ruling no. 51399 of 2023 emphasizes the legality of the retention of correspondence for inmates subjected to the regime under Article 41-bis, highlighting constitutional rights and security needs.
Let's analyze ruling no. 16141 of 2024, which clarifies the position of the Court of Appeal of Catanzaro regarding the inadmissibility of the request for suspension of the execution of the liquidation of a company subject to confiscation.
The ruling no. 17489 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits and conditions regarding the purchase of food items by inmates under a differentiated regime, highlighting the importance of ensuring security and order within penitentiary institutions.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides a new interpretation of the right to survivor's pension, extending it to orphaned grandchildren unable to work. A significant change for Italian social security law.
The ruling no. 11659 of 2024 clarifies the methods for recovering amounts improperly paid as NASpI, highlighting the applicability of Article 2033 of the Civil Code and the principles of graduality and proportionality.
Let's analyze Ordinance No. 11336 of 2024, which clarifies the conditions for using unemployment benefits as figurative contributions and the implications for pension rights.
Let us examine the very recent ruling no. 11058 of 2024, which clarifies the procedures for facilitated settlement of contribution debt following natural disasters, highlighting the terms and conditions for the suspension and installment of payments.
Let's analyze Judgment No. 10957 of 2024, which clarifies the limits and methods of the reimbursement of legal costs in social security proceedings, highlighting the importance of verifying health requirements.
Let's analyze the important order no. 10038 of April 15, 2024, which clarifies the applicability of art. 152 disp. att. c.p.c. to disputes related to agricultural unemployment and legal costs.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Bari clarifies the applicability of the facilitated definition to social security contributions, excluding the social security funds of professionals. Let’s explore the meaning and implications of this decision.