Explore Procedural Law Articles and Cases

Welcome to our page dedicated to procedural law. Here you will find a variety of articles and cases discussing legal procedures and processes.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 16099 of 2024: Appeal and Filing of the Reasoning in the Justice of the Peace Proceedings.

The recent ruling of the Ragusa Court clarifies the importance of filing the accompanying reasoning in the peace judgment, establishing a fifteen-day appeal period. Let's explore the significance of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 14380 of 2024: inadmissibility of the extraordinary appeal and 'de plano' procedure.

Let's analyze ruling no. 14380 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the inadmissibility of the extraordinary appeal and the related procedures. Together, let's uncover the legal implications of this decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 16867 of 2024: Legal Costs and Unjust Detention

Let's analyze ruling no. 16867 of 2024, which clarifies the methods of liquidating legal expenses in the case of compensation for wrongful detention and the implications of the principle of correlation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Effects of a Judge's Abstention: Analysis of Judgment No. 16481 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Catanzaro clarifies the effects of acts performed by a recused judge, highlighting the importance of the declaration of effectiveness for procedural validity.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 10465 of 2024: Nullity of the Judgment and Registration of the Conclusions

Let's analyze the important order no. 10465 of 2024, which clarifies the conditions for nullity of a judgment due to the omission of the transcription of the conclusions, a crucial issue in civil procedural law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 8685 of 2024: The Validity of Notification via PEC to the Special Curator.

Analysis of ruling no. 8685 of 2024, which clarifies the use of the lawyer's PEC address for notifications to a special curator, highlighting the importance of professionalism and the protection of confidentiality.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 10868 of 2024: Clarifications on the Qualification of the Claim in the Context of Opposition to Enforcement.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important insights into the qualification of claims regarding opposition to enforcement acts, clarifying the reference principles for the identification of appeal remedies.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 9680 of 2024: Opposition to the Injunction and Judicial Competence

Let's analyze ruling no. 9680 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation regarding the opposition to injunctions and the functional competence of judicial offices, in order to understand the practical and legal implications of this important decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 9451 of 2024: Errors of the Judicial Office and Nullity of the Merits Judgment.

Let's analyze judgment no. 9451 of 2024, which clarifies the consequences of the failure to conduct the summary phase in the opposition to enforcement acts. Let's discover how judicial office errors affect the validity of the claims.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 9343 of 2024: Challengeability of the Inadmissibility of the Appeal.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the appealability of declarations of inadmissibility of the appeal for procedural reasons, emphasizing the importance of specificity in appeal documents.