Precautionary measures play a crucial role in legal proceedings, ensuring fair and just outcomes. Dive into our selection of articles to learn more about this important aspect of the legal system.
Ruling No. 14657 of 2024 clarifies the importance of translation for non-Italian-speaking defendants in precautionary procedures, establishing that the absence of translation nullifies the measures adopted.
Let us analyze ruling no. 16343 of 2023, which clarifies the notion of the inferability of acts in precautionary measures, with particular reference to the complexity of EncroChat communications.
We explore ruling no. 15256 of 2023, which clarifies the limits of the review court regarding appeals against pre-trial detention. A thorough analysis that helps to understand the rights of defendants and the legal procedure.
Analysis of judgment no. 38605 of 2024 regarding extradition, highlighting the importance of assessing the grounds for refusal under Article 714, paragraph 3, of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Let’s analyze the recent ruling no. 36945 of 2024, which clarifies the limits of the right to compensation for wrongful detention in the case of passive extradition and the implications for the rights of defendants.
Judgment No. 37924 of 2024 clarifies the defendant's right to personally participate in the review hearing, even with a supplementary request. An important safeguard for the defense in criminal proceedings.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation analyzes the complexity of precautionary measures in a case of extortion, highlighting the importance of the credibility assessment of testimonies and the reasons for the decision.
Let's explore the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation regarding personal precautionary measures in the context of an investigative cover-up case, highlighting the legal principles applied and the implications for criminal law.
The recent ruling by the Court of Cassation clarifies the responsibilities of the technical manager in waste management, highlighting the importance of supervision and control in the prevention of environmental offenses.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the evaluation criteria for precautionary measures in matters of criminal association in drug trafficking, providing insights for both the defense and the prosecution.