Understanding the Concept of Inadmissibility in Legal Proceedings

Learn about the concept of inadmissibility in legal proceedings and explore related articles and court decisions on this curated page by Bianucci Law Firm.

Bianucci Law Firm
The correction of material error according to the Court of Cassation: Order No. 8620 of 2024.

Discover how the Supreme Court of Cassation clarified the inadmissibility of the request for the correction of a clerical error submitted personally by the party, pursuant to Article 82, paragraph 2, of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ruling No. 11657 of 2024: Inadmissibility of the Application for Comprehensive Liquidation of Fees.

The recent ruling No. 11657 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the inadmissibility of the appeal regarding the all-inclusive settlement of fees, highlighting the necessity of specific complaints regarding the rate and compensation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 11043 of 2024: Inadmissibility of the Appeal to the Supreme Court.

Let’s analyze ruling no. 11043 of 2024, which clarifies the consequences of the failure to file the challenged decision in fair trial compensation proceedings for unreasonable length of proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 9450 of 2024: The Importance of Relevance in the Appeal to the Court of Cassation.

Discover how the ruling of the Court of Cassation highlights the need for a well-structured appeal, emphasizing the consequences of irrelevant criticisms to the decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 17225 of 2023: the importance of defensive investigations in criminal proceedings.

The illustration of ruling no. 17225 of 2023 highlights the importance of formal correctness in defensive investigations and the legal consequences of the failure to draft the authentication report.

Bianucci Law Firm
Inadmissibility of WhatsApp Messages: Analysis of Judgment No. 39548 of 2024

The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2024 clarifies the limits on the acquisition of WhatsApp messages by the judicial police, highlighting the need for a seizure warrant to ensure their validity as evidence.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 37668 of 2024: Inadmissibility of the Appeal and Residence of the Defendant.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important insights into the verification of the suitability of the domicile declared by the defendant, highlighting the need for careful assessment in cases of inadmissibility of the appeal. Let us delve into the legal details and practical implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Renewal of the trial and inadmissibility of witness statements: analysis of ruling no. 39596 of 2024.

The ruling no. 39596 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation addresses the delicate issue of the renewal of the trial and the inadmissibility of witness statements in the absence of the parties' consent. An in-depth analysis to understand the legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 36918 of 2024: Unusable Statements Not Assisted and Requests for Retroactive Dating.

The recent ruling no. 36918 of 2024 clarifies the exceptions to the inadmissibility of statements made by individuals who were late in registering in the criminal record, highlighting the importance of the request for retroactive registration according to Article 335-quater of the Code of Criminal Procedure.